MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930178060 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11068007

CO2-SPICER - CO2 Storage Pilot In a CarbonatE Reservoir: R6.4 Data set and report with results of well integrity logging

2023· report· en· W6930178060 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typereport
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersEEA Grants/Norway GrantsTechnology Agency of the Czech Republic
KeywordsLoggingCasingWorkoverSonic loggingWell loggingIntegrity managementPetroleum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project partner MND has selected well ZA7 (Žarošice 7) for well integrity logging just after workover and provided on site assistance. For well integrity logging, Cement Bond Logging and Acoustic Televiewer were selected as main methods; gamma ray log and casing collar locator were used as complementary logging methods. Results of the ZA7 well (drilled in 2003) integrity logging demonstrate that after 20 year of exposure to the aggressive reservoir environment with presence of Na-Cl brine, natural gas and crude oil but also certain amounts of CO2 and H2S is still in good condition. CO2 injection will represent more aggressive environment in Zar-3 storage site. In this case, the well integrity logging has to be planned and realized relatively often; currently no legislative regulation defines a frequency of such measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.294
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→