Bibliographic record
Abstract
CLERUCHOIDES Lin & Huber, 2007 (Figs 75–80) Cleruchoides Lin & Huber in Lin et al., 2007: 53. Type species: Cleruchoides noackae Lin & Huber, 2007, by original designation. Diagnosis. Face light coloured, with distinct black bar extending obliquely from each torulus to mouth margin (Fig. 78); mandibles short, directed ventrally, apparently with only one short tooth and not meeting when closed (Figs 75a,b); funicle segments longer than wide, clava 1-segmented (Fig. 76); fore wing widening towards apex and with a distinct lobe behind venation and with a distinct constriction between the apex of the parastigma and base of the stigmal vein (Fig. 77); metasoma with slightly crenulate transverse row of sculpture near posterior margin of each tergum (Fig. 80a). Remarks. Cleruchoides belongs to the Cleruchus group of genera. The fore wing is wider than in Cleruchus, with a distinct lobe posterior to apex of venation. The black line ventral to each torulus is diagnostic, at least for the only known species (introduced from the Old World) in the Neotropical region. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae. Important reference. Lin et al. (2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".