Bibliographic record
Abstract
Martes americana Turton 1806 Martes americana Turton 1806, in: Linnaeus, Gen. Syst. Nat., Vol. 1: 60. Type Locality: "North America". Vernacular Names: American Marten. Subspecies:: Subspecies Martes americana subsp. americana Turton 1806 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. abieticola Preble 1902 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. abietinoides Gray 1865 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. actuosa Osgood 1900 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. atrata Bangs 1897 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. caurina Merriam 1890 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. humboldtensis Grinnell and Dixon 1926 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. kenaiensis Elliot 1903 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. nesophila Osgood 1901 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. origensis Rhoads 1902 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. sierrae Grinnell and Storer 1916 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. vancourverensis Grinnell and Dixon 1926 Subspecies Martes americana subsp. vulpina Rafinesque 1819 Distribution: Canada, USA (Alaska to N California, south in the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mtns to 35°N, Maine, Minnesota, New York). Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: May be conspecific with martes, melampus, and zibellina (Anderson, 1970; Hagmeier, 1961). Reviewed by Clark et al. (1987) who considered New World forms as a distinct species agreeing with Youngman (1975). Carr and Hicks (1997) recognized two distinct species based on genetic data (M. americana – Eastern North America; M. caurina – Pacific Northwest and the Great Plains). However, most have recognized that there are two distinct subspecies groups – " caurina " and " americana " (Anderson, 1970; Clark et al., 1987; Graham and Graham, 1994; Hagmeier, 1961; Stone and Cook, 2002). Synonyms allocated according to Hall (1981) and Clark et al. (1987). Stone and Cook (2002) placed in the subgenus Martes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".