MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930228062 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406196

Scipopus (Parascipopus) kubus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, subgen. et sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6930228062 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeThorax (insect anatomy)ParatypeChaetotaxyTaxonomy (biology)AppendageSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Parascipopus) kubus subgen. et sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: D58F6E83-3CE4-4A3C-9CCA-B7BEB4008E7F Fig. 38 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Parascipopus) kubus sp. nov. resembles most species of Scipopus s. str. in having a primarily orange head and dark brown body with a blue sheen, but differs from Scipopus s. str. in having an entirely white microtrichose anepisternum, an anteriorly tapered and pointed frontal vitta, a shiny orbital plate and a more anteriorly tapered thorax (length/height>1). Etymology The species name is a noun in apposition that honours the first author’s significant other. Type material examined Holotype COSTA RICA • 1 ♀; Alajuela, San Ramón Biol. Res.; 900 m a.s.l.; Apr–May 2000.; P. Hanson leg.; debu00206289/MYCRO579-19 sequenced for COI; MNCR (photographed, Fig. 38A, B, D). Paratypes COSTA RICA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; debu00206315/MYCRO568-19 sequenced for CO1; MNCR (dissected and photographed, Fig. 38C) • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; MNCR. Description LENGTH. 11–15 mm. HEAD. Antenna orange. Palpus orange, brown basally, pale microtrichose and setulose, narrow (length 5.0× height). Clypeus orange, brown medially, width ~2.1 × height, sparsely silvery microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose, posterior apex evenly tapered to a narrow apex. Orbital plate orange, shiny, bare, clearly delineated. Epicephalon orange, shiny, bare, wide (width>⅔ of upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Paracephalon orange. All head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown, dark brown microtrichose, with a very broad silvery-blue median sheen. Female cervical sclerite convex. Postpronotal lobe black-brown, setulose on outer lateral margin. Notopleuron black-brown. Pleuron black-brown with blue sheen, entirely covered in silvery microtrichosity, denser on posterior katepisternum and forming transverse silvery band (only visible at some angles). Legs black-brown; fore and hind tarsomere 1 dark brown or black with ventral golden fringe. Wing evenly dark brown infuscate. Apical scutellar seta present. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1 with fine, long, white setae. Pleuron pale grey, microtrichose, P1, dorsal half of P2 dark brown or grey, indistinctly dark brown or grey on dorsal half of P3–6. T1+2 ~2.2× length of T3. Oviscape black-brown, setulose, white microtrichose on anterior ⅓, ~3.0 × length of T6. Common duct very short, ⅛ of entire duct length. Paired spermathecal duct short (4.0 × length of paired spermathecae) narrow, very swollen distally. Paired spermathecal stems with very short, narrow, straight basal section and long, sinuate distal portion. Paired spermathecae ovoid, with an apical indentation (collapsed in Fig. 38C). Single spermathecal duct arising from base of paired duct, narrow, ½ diameter and ¾ length of paired duct, single spermatheca elongate, inornate. MALE ABDOMEN. Not observed. Distribution Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207