MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930280797 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10732264

Python version of RothC Official Rothamsted Research Release

2024· other· en· W6930280797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsPython (programming language)Radiocarbon datingSoil carbonTotal organic carbonSoil waterHydrology (agriculture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rothamsted carbon model Python version (RothC_Py) Purpose RothC models the turnover of organic carbon in non-waterlogged top-soil. It accounts for the effects of soil texture, temperature, moisture content and plant cover on the turnover process. It uses a monthly time step to calculate total organic carbon (t ha-1), microbial biomass carbon (t ha-1) and Δ14C (from which the equivalent radiocarbon age of the soil can be calculated). Development history The first version of RothC created by David Jenkinson and James Rayner in 1977 (Jenkinson and Rayner, 1977). In 1987 an updated version was published, see Jenkinson et al. (1987). This version included the prediction of the radiocarbon age of the soil, the pools POM (physically stabilized organic matter) and COM (chemically stabilized organic matter) were replaced with Hum (humified organic matter) and IOM (inert organic matter), and the microbial biomass pool was split into BioA (autochthonous biomass) and BioZ (zymogenous biomass). In 1990, the two biomass pools were combined into a single pool (Jenkinson, 1990) this version is the standard version of the model, that this code refers to. Other published developments of the model include: Farina et al. (2013) modified the soil water dynamics for semi-arid regions. Giongo et al. (2020) created a daily version and modified the soil water dynamics, for Caatinga shrublands, in the semiarid region, North-East Brazil. Description of files included RothC_description.pdf This file contains the description of the model. RothC_Py.py This file contains the RothC code in Python language. Details of the inputs required, pools modelled, and units are in the code. RothC_input.dat This file contains input variables for the model. At the start of the file values for clay (%), soil depth (cm), inert organic matter (IOM, t C ha-1) and number of steps (nsteps) are recorded.Following that there is a table which records monthly data on year, month, percentage of modern carbon (%), mean air temperature (Tmp, °C), total monthly rainfall (Rain, mm), total monthly open-pan evaporation (Evap, mm), all carbon input entering the soil (from plants, roots, root exudates) (C_inp, t C ha-1), carbon input from farmyard manure (FYM, t C ha-1), plant cover (PC, 0 for no plants e.g. bare or post-harvest, 1 for plants e.g. crop or grass), and the DPM/RPM ratio (DPM_RPM) of the carbon inputs from plants. year_results.csv This file contains the yearly values of the SOC (both the pools and Total) and the delta 14-carbon. The pools are:YearMonth - Always December for the yearly outputDPM - Decomposable plant material (t C ha-1)RPM - Resistant plant material (t C ha-1)BIO - Microbial biomass (t C ha-1)HUM - Humified organic matter (t C ha-1)IOM - Inert organic matter (t C ha-1)SOC - Total soil organic carbon (t C ha-1)deltaC - delta 14C (‰) The total organic carbon (soil organic carbon) is equal to the sum of the 5 pools. TOC or SOC = DRM + RPM + BIO + HUM + IOM month_results.csv This file contains the monthly inputs, rate modifying factors, SOC pools. YearMonthDPM_t_C_ha - Decomposable plant material (t C ha-1)RPM_t_C_ha - Resistant plant material (t C ha-1)BIO_t_C_ha - Microbial biomass (t C ha-1)HUM_t_C_ha - Humified organic matter (t C ha-1)IOM_t_C_ha - Inert organic matter (t C ha-1)SOC_t_C_ha - Total soil organic carbon (t C ha-1) Requirements The code was written in Python 3.9.7. Installation/set-up A directory path will need to be provided as indicated in the code ([“INPUT DIRECTORY PATH”]), to read in RothC_input.dat. Example of how to run the modelThe file RothC_input.dat contains all the inputs data needed to run the model. The month results (month_results.csv) and year results (year_results.csv) files correspond to this input file as an example. The model is normally run to equilibrium using average temperature, rainfall, open pan evaporation, an average carbon input to the soil, the equilibrium run is to initialise the soil carbon pools. Once the soil carbon pools have been initialised, the model is run for the period of interest. The met data (temperature, rainfall and evaporation) can be average or actual weather data. The carbon input to the soil can be: 1) adjusted so the modelled output matches the measured data, or 2) can be estimated from yield data (Bolinder et al., 2007), or NPP data. References Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, VandenBygaart AJ. An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2007; 118: 29-42.Farina R, Coleman K, Whitmore AP. Modification of the RothC model for simulations of soil organic C dynamics in dryland regions. Geoderma 2013; 200: 18-30.Giongo V, Coleman K, Santana MD, Salviano AM, Olszveski N, Silva DJ, et al. Optimizing multifunctional agroecosystems in irrigated dryland agriculture to restore soil carbon - Experiments and modelling. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 725.Jenkinson DS. The Turnover of Organic-Carbon and Nitrogen in Soil. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 1990; 329: 361-368.Jenkinson DS, Hart PBS, Rayner JH, Parry LC. Modelling the turnover of organic matter in long-term experiments at Rothamsted. INTECOL Bulletin 1987; 15: 1-8.Jenkinson DS, Rayner JH. Turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Science 1977; 123: 298-305.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.168

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207