MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930310490 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12735237

Canadian Census Data Discovery Partnership (CCDDP): Census Data Discovery and Access in Canada: Stakeholder Perspectives

2024· article· en· W6930310490 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCensus and Population Estimation
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives CanadaStatistics CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusDiscoverabilityGeneral partnershipAmerican Community SurveyData managementPresentation (obstetrics)StakeholderData access

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery and access of historical and contemporary census data for use in research poses significant challenges in Canada. With distributed discovery and access portals including government, archives, libraries, and research projects, this necessitates collaborative efforts among various stakeholders. This panel aims to present a comprehensive overview of the Canadian Census Data Discovery Partnership (CCDDP), a SSHRC funded partnership project (2020-2023), focused on bringing together census data stakeholders, disseminators, and stewards, aiming to discuss challenges, innovations, and collaborative initiatives developed to enhance the discoverability and access to Canadian census data. Experts from key stakeholders groups, including the Library and Archives Canada (LAC), CCDDP project committee, and Statistics Canada, will provide unique insights into their contributions and experiences, underscoring the critical need for collective stewardship of valuable census data in Canada.CCDDP Project Overview: This presentation will delve into the CCDDP's comprehensive census data inventory (1666-2021) and user needs analysis, shedding light on the current state of census data discovery and access. Additionally, it will showcase the prototype of the census data discovery portal, developed as a solution for finding historical and contemporary census data in Canada, emphasizing its role as a distributed discovery tool for users.LAC Census Search: This segment will feature insights from Library and Archives Canada on the challenges and successes encountered in facilitating the discovery and access to census data. The presentation will highlight the importance of effective data management and search tools, and the role of the LAC Census Search in this context.Statistics Canada: This section will explore the innovative census data dissemination tools and access models introduced by Statistics Canada. A representative from Statistics Canada will share insights into the latest strategies and technologies employed to enhance data dissemination, facilitating improved access for a broader user base.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.063 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCensus and Population EstimationFrench-language works237,207