MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930357715 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10538642

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) packeri Gibbs 2010, new species

2010· other· en· W6930357715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumHead (geology)Apex (geometry)Anterior surfaceBasal (medicine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Lasioglossum</i> (<i>Dialictus</i>) <i>packeri</i> Gibbs, new species <p>(Figures 167A–D, 168A–F)</p> <p> <b>Holotype.</b> ♀ CANADA, Saskatchewan, Grassland National Park, prairie, N49.0711 W106.52935, 830 m, 4.vi.2007 (Goulet, Boudreault & Fernandez); [PCYU].</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Females of <i>L. packeri</i> can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of a small size (4.0– 4.4 mm), wide head (length/width ratio = 0.90–0.95), distinctly separated punctures on the frons (i=1–1.5d), very wide gena nearly 1.5 times wider than eye with widest point at midlength of eye (Fig. 167D), parallel hypostomal carinae, highly polished mesosoma due to lack of microsculpture, finely punctate mesepisternum distinct metatibial scopa, short basal rugae on metapostnotum that reach less than half way to posterior margin and brown metasoma with dense punctures on the dorsal surface of T1. They are similar to <i>L. pallidellum</i> and the southern USA species <i>L. semibrunneum</i> (Cockerell) (= <i>Halictus oleosus</i> Cockerell <b>new synonymy</b>). Female <i>L. pallidellum</i> have the gena narrower than the eye. Female <i>L. semibrunneum</i> have the gena narrower except some large specimens with a distinct tubercle located below the midlength of they eye and sparse punctures on the dorsal surface of T1.</p> <p> Males of <i>L. packeri</i> can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of small size (3.4–4.1 mm), abundant facial tomentum, short flagellomeres (length/width ratio = 1.00–1.25) that are bright yellow ventrally, acute dorsolateral angle of the pronotum, distinct mesepisternal punctures and short rugae on the metapostnotum reaching only halfway to the posterior margin.</p> <p>FEMALE. Length 3.97–4.39 mm; head length 1.27–1.44 mm; head width 1.34–1.61 mm; forewing length 3.05–3.23 mm.</p> <p> <i>Colouration.</i> Head and mesosoma bluish green with golden reflections. Labrum reddish to orange-yellow. Mandible orange-yellow. Clypeus with apical half blackish brown. Antenna dark brown, F2–F10 with ventral surface orange-yellow. Tegula translucent amber. Wing membrane subhyaline, venation and pterostigma pale yellow. Legs brown, medio- and distitarsi reddish brown. Metasoma dark brown, terga and sterna with apical margins translucent brownish yellow.</p> <p> <i>Pubescence.</i> Dull white to white. Moderately dense. Head and mesosoma with moderately dense woolly hairs (1–1.5 OD), longest on genal beard, metanotum and mesopleuron (2–2.5 OD). Lower paraocular area and gena with abundant tomentum. Propodeum with moderately dense plumose hairs on lateral and posterior surfaces (2–2.5 OD). Metasomal terga with abundant setae. T1 acarinarial fan complete dorsally. T1 basolaterally and T3–T5 entirely with sparse tomentum. T2 apicolateral and T3–T4 apical margins with sparse fringes.</p> <p> <i>Surface sculpture.</i> Face polished, punctation fine, deep. Clypeal punctation sparse (i=1–6d). Supraclypeal area with punctation moderately sparse (i=1–3d). Lower paraocular area punctation dense (i=d). Antennocular area punctation moderately dense (i=1–1.5d). Upper paraocular area and frons punctation distinctly separated (i=1–1.5d). Ocellocular area minutely punctate (i=d). Gena polished. Postgena imbricate. Mesoscutum polished, punctation sparse between parapsidal lines (i=1–5d), closer laterad of parapsidal lines and on anterolateral portion of disc (i=1–1.5d). Mesoscutellum polished, virtually impunctate. Axilla punctate. Metanotum distinctly minutely punctate (i≤d). Preëpisternum obscurely punctate (i≤d). Hypoepimeral area and mesepisternum polished, distinctly and finely punctate (i=1–1.5d). Metepisternum with dorsal third weakly rugulose and ventral portion imbricate. Metapostnotum basal half weakly rugoso-striate, apical half polished. Propodeum with dorsolateral slope weakly imbricate, lateral and posterior surfaces tessellate. Metasomal terga coriarious, punctation very fine and obscure throughout (i=1–2d).</p> <p> <i>Structure.</i> Head wide (length/width ratio = 0.90–0.95). Eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.06–1.08). Clypeus 2/3 below suborbital tangent, apicolateral margins very strongly convergent. Antennal sockets close (IAD/OAD> 0.6). Frontal line carinate, ending 1 OD below median ocellus. Gena at midlength approximately 1.5 times as wide as eye. Pronotum with dorsolateral angle orthogonal. Metatibial spur with 3 teeth. Metapostnotum moderately elongate (MMR ratio = 1.28–1.44), posterior margin rounded onto posterior surface. Propodeum with oblique carina absent, lateral carina weak, not reaching dorsal margin.</p> <p>MALE. Similar to female except for the usual secondary sexual characters and as follows. Length 3.36– 4.09 mm; head length 1.08 mm; head width 1.14 mm; forewing length 2.26–2.50 mm.</p> <p> <i>Colouration.</i> Labrum brownish yellow. Mandible yellow, apex red, base blackish brown. Flagellum with ventral surface yellow. Tibial bases and apices, and tarsi pale brownish yellow.</p> <p> <i>Pubescence</i>. Face below ocelli with dense tomentum obscuring surface. Clypeus with moderately sparse tomentum partially obscuring surface. Gena with moderately dense tomentum partially obscuring surface. S2– S4 with dense plumose hairs (1.5–2 OD).</p> <p> <i>Surface sculpture</i>. Clypeal punctation relatively dense (i=1–2d). Metasomal terga with distinct punctation throughout (i=1–2d).</p> <p> <i>Structure.</i> Head wide (length/width ratio = 0.95). Eyes strongly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.28). Clypeus 1/2 below suborbital tangent, apicolateral margins convergent. Antennal sockets distant (IAD/ OAD> 1.1). Frontal line carinate, ending 1.5 OD below median ocellus. Pedicel longer than or subequal to F1. F2 length 1.4–1.5X F1. F2–F10 short (length/width ratio = 1.00–1.25). Gena narrower than eye. Metapostnotum elongate (MMR ratio = 1.05–1.25), posterior margin broadly rounded onto posterior surface.</p> <p> <i>Terminalia</i>. Genitalia as in Fig. 168D–F. Gonostylus small, dorsal setae elongate. Retrorse lobe narrow, strongly attenuated apically.</p> <p> <b>Range.</b> Saskatchewan, Alberta south to Colorado (Fig. 165).</p> <p> <b>Allotype.</b> ♂ <b>CANADA:</b> SASKATCHEWAN: Grasslands N.P., N49.1799 W107.40047, 27.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); [PMAE].</p> <p> <b>Paratypes. CANADA:</b> ALBERTA: 2♀ Cypress Co., 10 km S Manyberries, Hwy 501, N49.26131 W110.59052, 948 m, 13.vi.2007 (Gibbs & Sheffield); [PCYU]; 1♀ Writing-On-Stone P.P., Grass-north, 17– 26.iv.1990 (D. McCorquodale); [PMAE]; SASKATCHEWAN: 1♀ topotypical; 1♀ 18 km S of Maple Creek, 3000ft., 16.vii.2005 (J. R. Vockeroth); [PCYU]; 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1791 W107.40721, 2.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.179997 W107.40047, 2.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1316 W107.59919, 13.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1791 W107.40721, 14.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.17997 W107.40047, 14.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1799 W107.40047, 23.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1791 W107.40721, 23.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 2♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1432 W107.44675, 23.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1791 W107.40721, 27.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 2♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1799 W107.40047, 27.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); 1♀ Grasslands N.P., N49.1903 W107.37732, 28.vii.1996 (A. T. Finnamore); [PMAE]; MANITOBA: 1♀ Russell, 21.vii.1954 (Brooks & Wallis); [CNC]; <b>USA:</b> COLORADO: 1♀ (<i>H. oleosus</i> homotype) Logan Co., Sterling, 18.vi.1923 (G. Sandhouse); 1♀ (<i>H. oleosus</i> homotype) Logan Co., Sterling, 28.vi.1923 (G. Sandhouse); [ANSP]; 1♀ Logan Co., Sterling, 18.vi.1923 (G. Sandhouse); [CNC]; SOUTH DAKOTA: 1♀ Badlands National Park, 20.viii.2008; 3♀ 2♂♂ Badlands National Park, 4.ix.2008; [BLNP].</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> It is a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3160.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207