MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930382512 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13242627

Fig. 2 in Environmental and ecological factors driving trematode parasite community assembly in central Alberta lakes

2020· other· en· W6930382512 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsPrincipal component analysisHomogeneity (statistics)Multivariate analysisHabitatCentroidStatistical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fig. 2. Multivariate Homogeneity of Group Dispersion for Trematode Communities. Bray-Curtis dissimilarities were used to examine the homogeneity of variance among samples (trematode species counts) when grouped by different geographical or anthropogenic-use distinctions. The left panels show the twodimensional visualizations of the data by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCA) plots. Each grouping is labeled in the center, and ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals. The right panels provide a boxplot of the distance to centroid for each group in the multivariate analysis. A) samples grouped by site, B) grouped by river basin, C) grouped by ecoregion, D) group by site-type or anthropogenic use (beach or boat launch). Statistical significance for differences between groups is indicated by an asterisk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→