Fig. 3 in The Arthropod Associates of 155 North American Cynipid Oak Galls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fig. 3. Summary of data for Euceroptres inquilines collected from Nearctic galls. For full explanation of figure details, refer to figure 1 legend. a) Associations of Euceroptres with the Nearctic oak gall wasp phylogeny (Fig. S1). b) Gall types from which Euceroptres were reared in the Californian (blue), Mexican and Central American (orange), and Eastern North American (green) floristic provinces. c) Associations of Euceroptres with trees in sections Quercus (Q), Lobatae (L), and Virentes (V). d) Association of Euceroptres with gall types on different oak tissues. e) proportion of gall types of three size categories ("small" <0.5 mm; "medium", "large"> 20 mm) from which Euceroptres were reared. f) Results of probabilistic co-occurrence analysis for Euceroptres against seven other common associates. Yellow = significantly less likely to co-occur; blue = significantly more likely to co-occur; gray = no difference from probabilistic expectations. g) Euceroptres lateral habitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.292 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".