MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930404782 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10166984

Atheta (Dimetrota) districta Casey 1911

2023· article· en· W6930404782 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwampDeciduousPlant litterLitterTaiga

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

41. Atheta (Dimetrota) districta Casey (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Casey 1911. Klimaszewski et al. 2005 a, 2018. Majka and Klimaszewski 2008. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: AB, BC, LB, MB, NB, NF, NS, ON, QC, SK. USA (NCR): ME (NSR), NH (NSR). Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were found in leaf litter at a birch sap drip in deciduous forests and in an old burned field. Collected in May and August–October by window and flight intercept traps, and by sifting rotting lawn clippings. In Canada found in various forest types, usually in dung or decaying mushrooms: eastern white cedar swamp in moose dung, mature red spruce and eastern white cedar forest in deer dung, mixed forest in bear dung, in decaying (moldy) corncobs and cornhusks near mixed forest, regenerating mixed forest in decaying mushrooms, near lakeshore in decaying fungi, and in an old jack pine forest in rotten Boletus mushrooms. Also taken in a red maple swamp in leaf litter near a stream, and by pitfall traps in a red spruce forest A few specimens were collected at UV lights (Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, Maine, Piscataquis Co.: Mt. Katahdin, 5200’, 3.IX.1939, 1 male. York Co.: West Lebanon, 7–13.V.1991, 1 male; 10–16.VII.1990, 1 male; 17–23.VII.1990, 1 male; 21–27.VIII.1990, 25–30.IX.1990, 1 female, D.W. Barry, FIT, 1 male, 1 female. New Hampshire, Carroll Co.: 6 mi NW Bartlett Nancy Brook Trail, 1500’, 9.IX.1987, Y. Bousquet (CNC), 1 sex? Crawford Notch, 3–5.IX.1970, S. Peck, deciduous forest, human dung trap (CNC), 1 male, 1 female. Coos Co.: 8 mi E Gorham, 800’, 14.VIII.1976, J.M. and B.A. Campbell (CNC), 3 sex? 8 mi E Gorham, 800’, 15.VIII.1976, J.M. and B.A. Campbell (CNC) 8 sex? Strafford Co.: 1 mi SW Durham, 21.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter birch sap drip, 1 male, 1 female. Durham, 26.V.1987, W.J. Morse, rotting lawn clippings, 1 female. 4 mi W Durham, 19–21.V.1982, R.M. Reeves, window trap, 1 male. East Foss Farm, 32m, 1 km S Durham, 21.IX–4.X.2007, ZOOL 745/845 class, FIT, old burned field, 1 male, 1 female.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207