Flight initiation distance differs among eumelanin-based color morphs in feral pigeons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The table lists the variable and factors used in the article: “Flight initiation distance differs among eumelanin-based color morphs in feral pigeons” - “Individual” is an individual number to differentiate individiual feral pigeons - “Location” is the name of the location in Paris where the FID of the individual was measured - “Date” is the date when the FID of the individual was measured - “ColorMorph” is the eumelanin-based color morph of the individual - “Latitude” and “Longitude” are the spatial coordinates of the site in Paris where the FID of the individual was measured - "FID" is the Flight Initiation Distance measured - columns from “Urbanisation300” to “Urbanisation1000” are the Urbanization rates determined within increasing radius from 300 to 1000m around each individual - columns from “PedestrianTraffic300PropNiv1” to “PedestrianTraffic900PropNiv1” are the proportion of streets of level 1 intensity, measured within increasing radius from 300 to 900m - columns from “PedestrianTraffic300PropNiv2” to “PedestrianTraffic900PropNiv2” are the proportion of streets of level 2 intensity, measured within increasing radius from 300 to 900m - columns from “PedestrianTraffic300PropNiv3” to “PedestrianTraffic900PropNiv2” are the proportion of streets of level 3 intensity, measured within increasing radius from 300 to 900m
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".