MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930433002 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13630290

Tetrapyrgos subdendrophora E. Horak, Sydowia

2015· article· en· W6930433002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileusContext (archaeology)HolotypeOverprintingStipe (mycology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tetrapyrgos subdendrophora (Redhead) E. Horak, Sydowia 39: 103. 1987 [1986]. Fig. 7a–h Basionym: Campanella subdendrophora Redhead, Mycologia 66: 185. 1974. Synonym: Pterospora subdendrophora (Redhead) E. Horak, Sydowia 36: 137. 1983. Holotype:— CANADA. British Columbia: University of British Columbia Endowment Lands, on Phalaris arundinacea, 15 September 1972, leg. SA Redhead (DAOM 145301!). The holotype specimen consists of numerous grass stems glued to the inside of the lid of a specimen box, with>10 tiny fragmented basidiomes attached to substrate, and several loose fragmented basidiomes in a packet. Description of dried holotype: Pileus convex, cleft; surface wrinkled, pallid cream. Lamellae poorly developed, forked, narrow, cream. Stipe well-developed, eccentric, passing through cleft in pileus, cylindrical, curved; surface pruinose, pallid. Description based on newly collected specimens: Pileus 2–10 (–22) mm diam., in side view hemispherical or convex when young, becoming irregular to plano-convex in age; in face view chordate to rounded or irregularly chordate; rugulose to rugulo-sulcate; surface dull, dry, opaque to subtranslucent, minutely pruinose or felted overall, white through development, staining greyish brown to bluish grey or olivaceous. Context in pileus thin (<0.5 mm), rubbery-gelatinous, pliant, concolorous. Lamellae shallowly adnate to adnexed, distant, with 1–2 series of lamellulae, strongly anastomosing and intervenose, edges pruinose, white, staining concolorous with pileus in age. Stipe 0.5–3 × 0.5–1 mm, eccentric to strongly eccentric, appearing lateral in side view, arising through the cleft in pileus, even or slightly tapered downward, solid, white at very apex, base black to blue black, white-pruinose overall, arising from a black basal disc. Odor and taste not distinctive. Basidiospores (6.4–) 8–12 × (4.8–) 5.6–10.4 μm [x mr = 8.4–10.2 × 6.5–7.7 μm, x mm = 9.5 ± 0.62 × 7.2 ± 0.48 μm, Q = 1–1.9, Q mr = 1.2–1.5, Q mm = 1.3 ± 0.12, n = 20, s = 13], triangular to shallowly tetrahedral, often with a large vacuole, hyaline, inamyloid, thin-walled. Basidia 36–45 × 3.2–8 μm, clavate, 4-spored, hyaline, inamyloid, thin-walled, clamped. Basidioles 28–38 × 4–7 μm, clavate to fusoid, hyaline, inamyloid, thin-walled. Hymenial cystidia common on lamellar sides and edges, 40–64 × 3.2–9.5 μm, irregularly cylindrical; apex capitate 6.5–9.5 diam, hyaline, inamyloid, thin-walled to firm-walled (–0.7 μm), ranging from non-diverticulate to somewhat densely diverticulate on the central axis, pedicellate, rarely entirely diverticulate; diverticula 0.8–4 (–8.8) × 0.8–2.4 (–4.8) μm, cylindrical or knob-like, occasionally branched. Pileipellis a Rameales -structure of loosely interwoven diverticulate hyphae with suberect to erect terminal cells; terminal cells 35–53 × 3–8 μm, irregularly cylindrical, densely diverticulate below a clavate to bulbous capitulum, 5.5–8 μm diam; apex occasionally thick-walled, hyaline, inamyloid, thin-walled; diverticula 0.8–4 × 0.8–3.2 μm, cylindrical to knob-like, occasionally conical or branched. Pileus trama weakly gelatinized. Lamellar trama interwoven; hyphae cylindrical, smooth, gelatinized. Stipitipellis similar to the pileipellis. Clamp connections present. Habitat and known distribution: On monocotyledonous leaves and stems of Carex spp. (Cyperaceae), Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae) and various other grasses, and rarely on dicotyledonous stems (Rubus) and twigs (Baccharis). Western North America. Material examined:— CANADA. British Columbia: University of British Columbia Endowment Lands, 15 September 1972, leg. SA Redhead (DAOM 145301, Holotype). UNITED STATES. California: Mendocino County, Jackson State Forest, road to Mendocino Woodland Camp off Hwy 408, AH Honan 149 (SFSU); San Mateo County, Junipero Serra Park, December 2004, AH Honan 78, AH Honan 79 (SFSU); same location, 22 February 2005, AH Honan 119 (SFSU); same location, 5 March 2005, AH Honan 120 (SFSU); San Mateo County, Montara State Beach, McNee Ranch, beginning of trail to Montara Mountain, 12 November, 2005, AH Honan 148 (SFSU); Solano County, near Monticello Dam, along banks of Putah Creek, 29 January 2005, AH Honan 118 (SFSU); Sonoma County, Salt Point State Park, Woodside Campground, 11 November 2001, DE Desjardin 7338 (SFSU). Oregon: Coos County, Bullard’s Beach, 25 November 2005, AH Honan 152 (SFSU). Commentary: Based on morphological and molecular data, T. subdendrophora and T. olivaceonigra are sister taxa, differing subtly in basidiome pigmentation. Tetrapyrgos subdendrophora is distinguished by a small white pileus, strongly intervenose-anastomosing lamellae, the reduced and eccentric stipe, slightly gelatinized tramal tissues, and sparsely centrally diverticulate, capitate cheilocystidia. Interestingly, T. subdendrophora fruits on both monocotyledonous (members of the Cyperaceae and Poaceae) and rarely on dicotyledonous (Baccharis, Rubus) substrates. Redhead (1974) provided black and white photographs of basidiomes on grass culms, and a map referencing specimens from western Canada and Oregon (Redhead 1989). Desjardin et al. (2015) published a color photograph of basidiomes from California. Tetrapyrgos subdendrophora is morphologically similar also to T. reducta and T. tropicalis, differing by the features outlined in the key.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207