MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930434580 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14884865

On Never Explaining Anything and Forgetting Almost Everything

2024· article· en· W6930434580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Literary Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgettingAllegoryArgument (complex analysis)TricksterRidiculousSimulacrum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agnes Horvath’s argument that modern society is premised on magical and alchemical language, logic, and techniques is examined through an assessment of early modern philosophical sources. Her categories are further discussed in light of Plato’s allegory of the cave and his treatment of wizardry and bewitchment in politics. An application of Horvath’s concepts of the trickster or replicator and their operators, and the transformation of persons into what she calls the living dead, is made with respect to interventions, opinions, and behaviours familiar from the era of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The possibility of a revival of charis and the restoration of integrity of soul, along the lines of what Horvath recommends, is then considered, with attention to the difficulties resulting not only from various transformations imposed upon humanity, but also the very human tendency toward forgetfulness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it