MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930484790 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14799941

Supplementary Data for "Incorporating Community Knowledge into Analysis of Air Quality Monitoring Network Data"

2025· dataset· en· W6930484790 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)UploadPopulationPublic useCategorical variableShapefileSample (material)Data file

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These are the underlying data sets needed to perform the peak analysis and create the land-use regression (LUR) models described in the paper. There are four datasets: "RAMP_Location.csv": Locations and IDs of the low-cost sensors used in this work. [NOTE: latitudes and longitudes for the sensor deployments have been intentionally rounded to protect the location of volunteer sensor hosts.] "RAMP_data.zip": This contains the csv files of calibrated PM2.5, NO, NO2, CO and O3 measurements for the entire study period across all low-cost sensor sites. "Vancouver_Population_Density_2016.zip": Shapefile of the population within each Dissemination Area from the 2016 Canadian Census. This information was originally extracted from the Canadian Census Analyser supported by the University of Toronto. "smell_van_data.csv": Contains the locations, date, and description of odor reports during the monitoring period from the Smell Vancouver website (https://smell-vancouver.ca) There is also sample code in Python to perform the peak analysis and create the LURs. [NOTE: we have intentionally excluded uploading the exact data sets imported by this code; our original data contains exact locations of sensor host volunteers and thus cannot be shared.] "Peak_analysis_geohealth.py": A Python script to perform the peak analysis from the paper. "LUR_strathcona_geohealth.py": A Python script to create the LURs and maps of LUR results from the paper. Links to other data used in the code from publicly available sources: Railway locations - https://opendata.vancouver.ca/explore/dataset/railways/information/ Public streets - https://opendata.vancouver.ca/explore/dataset/public-streets/information/ Land use - https://open-data-portal-metrovancouver.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/metrovancouver::landuse-2016-code-description/about Bus stops - https://abacus.library.ubc.ca/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:11272.1/AB2/QQLSCJ Block outlines - https://opendata.vancouver.ca/explore/dataset/block-outlines/information/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5330.180

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207