MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930496780 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13831121

MESA inlists for the paper Quantifying systematic uncertainties in white dwarf cooling age determinations

2024· dataset· en· W6930496780 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Intergroup Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectoryWhite dwarfWhite (mutation)MesaSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains the work directories for running the MESA models presented in the paper "Quantifying systematic uncertainties in white dwarf cooling age determinations". 1. Contents MESA model work directories 'wd_builder' work directory for creating initial white dwarf models 'all_compositions_fitted' directory containing Oxygen abundance profiles. 2. Requirements MESA version: r23.05.1 MESASDK version x86_64-linux-22.6.1. Proper environment variables must be set up before running MESA (see MESA documentation) 3. Directory Structure 'all_compositions_fitted' This directory contains Oxygen abundance profiles for 0.6 Msun white dwarf from various evolutionary models and asteroseismological studies. These profiles were used to inform the parameter space sampled in this work. 'wd_builder' This directory contains inlists for the MESA tool 'wd_builder'. It uses an initial composition file 'composition.dat' to create an initial white dwarf model called 'saved.mod'. 'phase_sep' This directory contains the inlists for white dwarf evolution, modified from the inlists of Bauer 2023. It uses the initial white dwarf model 'saved.mod' and creates an evolved, cooled white dwarf model at 3000K called 'final.mod'. 4. Usage Set up the MESA environment variables as per the MESA documentation. Use the 'wd_builder' directory to create an initial white dwarf model: Ensure 'composition.dat' is present in the directory. Run the MESA 'wd_builder' tool to generate 'saved.mod' Use the 'phase_sep' directory to evolve the white dwarf model: Copy or move 'saved.mod' to this directory. Run the MESA evolution script to generate 'final.mod'. 5. References Bauer, E. B. (2023). MESA inlists for white dwarf evolution. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/7846751 For more details on the research methodology and results, please refer to the full paper: "Quantifying systematic uncertainties in white dwarf cooling age determinations".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5820.526

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSocial and Intergroup Psychology→French-language works237,207→