MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930512369 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13905744

Global 32-4 km variable-resolution mesh for the MPAS-Atmosphere model

2024· dataset· en· W6930512369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetCDFGridAtmospheric researchFile formatData centerResearch centerTimelineBlock (permutation group theory)Mesh generation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This mesh was created by a collaboration between the Department of Energy’s Water Cycle and Climate Extremes Modeling (WACCEM) project and the Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology (MMM) Laboratory at the National Science Foundation National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF/NCAR). The mesh contains 1,830,914 horizontal grid cells. The circular refinement region has a radius of approximately 20 degrees. The 4-32km grid-spacing range aims to achieve convection-permitting resolution in the high-resolution domain and resolution sufficient for the jet stream and mid-latitude wave activities (Lu et al., 2015) in the low-resolution domain. The netcdf file "x8.1830914.grid.nc" includes the variables defining the global unstructured grid for the MPAS model as described in the MPAS Mesh Specification. Following the other MPAS mesh data, we provide graph.info.part.* files necessary for the Message Passing Interface (MPI) parallelism. For example, a simulation using 1024 MPI ranks will use graph.info.part.1024. For the number of MPI tasks not provided in this dataset, a user needs to create a new partitioning file using the METIS tool and the graph.info file as described in the MPAS user guide (available here). This data will also be available from the MPAS mesh website. The mesh generation is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research (BER) as part of the Regional and Global Model Analysis Program Area. We acknowledge the use of computational resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC). The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→