Bibliographic record
Abstract
COSMOCOMOIDEA Howard, 1908 (Figs 93–97) Cosmocomoidea Howard, 1908: 68. Types species: Cosmocomoidea morrilli Howard, 1908, by monotypy. Diagnosis. Face with subantennal sulci ventral to torulus and strongly converging to mouth margin (Fig. 93a); vertex with 2 setae between lateral ocelli; pronotum medially divided, with lateral lobes abutting (Fig. 96); dorsellum rhomboidal, usually distinctly so, with anterior and posterior margins not parallel (Fig. 96) but in a few species almost parallel; fore wing with microtrichia posterior to venation usually absent (Fig. 95) but if microtrichia rarely present then only on dorsal surface or microtrichia less dense than distal to venation; propodeum with 2 submedian carinae (Fig. 96). Remarks. Cosmocomoidea belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera, treated as Gonatocerini by Huber (2015a). Cosmocomoidea is at present the most speciose genus in the Neotropical region. Features such as the relatively large size of individuals, their often colourful bodies, and their abundance as parasitoids of Cicadellidae (particularly of Proconiini, some of which are economically important pests) means that Cosmocomoidea spp. have been relatively more collected and studied compared to members of other genera of Mymaridae in the region. The species are most similar to those of Gonatocerus, but the fore wing is usually wider, usually has few or no microtrichia posterior to the venation, and usually has submedian carinae on the propodeum. Over 100 species of Cosmocomoidea may still be undescribed from the region. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera: Cicadellidae. Important reference s. Triapitsyn et al. (2010), Huber (2015a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".