MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930534068 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12126071

Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models"

2024· dataset· en· W6930534068 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsPython (programming language)Business Process Model and NotationJSONProcess modelingEvent (particle physics)Business processProcess (computing)Set (abstract data type)Measure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Datasets and files used in the evaluation of the publication entitled "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models", where: BPS-models/: folder containing the BPS models used in the evaluation (the BPS models discovered by ServiceMiner are not included due to privacy reasons). The BPS models discovered by SIMOD are composed of i) a BPMN file with the process model structure, and ii) a JSON file with the parameters of the simulation. These files correspond to the format of Prosimos simulation engine (https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/). The BPS models of the Loan Application and Procure to Pay processes are composed of a BPMN file with both the process model structure and parameters, corresponding to the format of the BIMP simulator used in APROMORE (https://apromore.com/). measures/: folder containing the distance values of each measure reported in the paper. original-event-logs/: folder containing the (train and test) event logs used in the evaluation. simulated-logs/: folder containing the simulated logs evaluated in the paper (synthetic, SIMOD, and ServiceMiner). ComputeLogDistance.py: script to compute the distance measures proposed in the paper. To evaluate the distance measures of a set of simulated event logs in the folder simulated_logs/ against the test log test_event_log.csv.gz, run: python ComputeLogDistance.py -cfld test_event_log.csv.gz simulated_logs/ *The flag -cfld is optional, due to the high computational complexity of the CFLD measure. WARNING: set the column names of each log accordingly (where log_1_ids are the IDs of the test log, and log_2_ids the IDs of the simulated logs). Examples: # Column IDs for the (train/test) real-life logs, and the SIMOD simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the Loan Application and Procure to Pay simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='Start_Time', end_time='End_Time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the ServiceMiner simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='Activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='Resource' )

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies→French-language works237,207→