Bibliographic record
Abstract
TANYXIPHIUM Huber, 2015 (Figs 321–329) Tanyxiphium Huber, 2015a: 57. Type species: Tanyxiphium seychellense Huber, 2015, by original designation. Diagnosis. Tanyxiphium is distinguished from the other genera of Gonatocerini by the following combination: mandible small, shorter than maxilla, with teeth minute (Fig. 321a); pronotum short, entire or apparently so (Fig. 324); dorsellum rhomboidal; ovipositor extending beyond gaster (Fig. 325a). Male head wider (Fig. 326a,b) and relatively narrower than in female (Fig. 321a,b); mandibles large, crossing when closed, each with 3 normal teeth (Fig. 326a); pronotum longer than in female, with lateral lobes apparently widely separated due to different colour of median area (Fig. 328). Remarks. Tanyxiphium belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera, treated formally as Gonatocerini in Huber (2015a). Tanyxiphium is the only genus of Gonatocerini that shows secondary sexual differences in structure of the head and mouthparts. Tanyxiphium is most similar to Gonatocerus but differs by the mandibles being sexually dimorphic (not so in Gonatocerus), the vertex with 4 setae between the lateral ocelli (2 in Gonatocerus), and the pronotum entire, though appearing divided, with widely separated lateral lobes (medially divided, with lateral lobes abutting at least ventrally in Gonatocerus). It also is similar to Lymaenon, which sometimes has the vertex with 4 setae between lateral ocelli, pronotum with widely separated lateral lobes though in Lymaenon the pronotum really is divided whereas in Tanyxiphium it appears to be entire because its posterior margin does not have any breaks. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Huber (2015a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".