Empis (Enoplempis) flavobulla Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empis (Enoplempis) flavobulla sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 2F5FA587-0538-4C3D-866A-18067878972D (Figs 250, 259–261, 265) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “ CALIF: Tuol. Co., S./ fork StanislausRiv.,/ 4airline mi. NE./ Columbia [38°04′N 120°20′W] III-25-65”; “ R. L. Langston / Collector”; “ Empis / (Enoplempis)/?dolabraria / Melander/ det/ WJ Turner ’78”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / flavobulla Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (EMEC). PARATYPES: USA. California: Same data as holotype (1♂, 1♀, EMEC); same data except, 3.iv.1964, JAP (3♂, 1♀, EMEC). El Dorado County: 8 mi. E Auburn, Greenwood Ck [38°54′N 120°54′W], 10.iii.1997, M.S. Caterino (2♂, 1♀, EMEC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) valentis species group by the occiput bearing a pair of irregular rows of strong setae (Fig. 259), four marginal scutellar setae, halter with pale knob (Fig. 259), male hind femur with narrow inner basal knob on anteroventral digitiform process (Fig. 260), and wing length less than 7 mm. Description. Wing length 6.5 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) aeripes, except as follows: head with occiput bearing pair of irregular rows of strong setae, similar in size to ocellar setae. Postpedicel long and tapered, 4× longer than basal width; stylus 1.5× longer than basal width of postpedicel. Palpus not visible. Thorax with postpronotum with 1 long seta and some 4–5 pairs of shorter, dark setae. Scutum with 2 posterior npl, with 1 shorter anterior npl. Scutellum with 2 pairs of strong sctl, widely separated medially. Hind femur with anteroventral process digitiform longer than apical width of femur, with tuft of black apical setae and several setae on stalk, with narrow basal lobe bearing several thin apical setae; one knob-like lobe medial to digitiform anteroventral process, straight, parallel-sided; one short knob-like posteroventral lobe proximal to preapical row of 4 flattened, black posterior setae; preapical anterior seta strong, slightly longer than width of femur (Figs 260, 261). Hind tibia with stout anteroventral digitiform process on basal quarter, slightly proximal to process of femur (when legs folded), with appressed black marginal setae; posteroventrally with broad, rounded process, with short marginal setae and tuft of long, subapical setae, subequal to length of process (Figs 259–261). Wing with R 5 ending posterior to wing tip. Halter pale, yellowish brown. Abdomen without posterior margin of tergites glossy. Terminalia (Fig. 265): dark brown. Cercus short, rectangular; dorsal margin with distinct notch at mid-length, posteriorly with distinct, dorsal knob-like projection; setae shorter than width of cercus. Subepandrium without process or setae. Epandrial lamella oval, higher than long; posterior margin with very short, knob-like projection; posterior margin with short setae. Hypandrium short, truncate, slightly prolonged laterally; without setae. Phallus with basal half strongly expanded; tapered apically, mostly straight apically; apex not emerging beyond epandrium; lateral face of phallus with thickened spicules; ejaculatory apodeme more than half-length of epandrium, Y-shaped, with ventrally positioned lateral apodemes. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons slightly broader; hindleg without modified setae and processes; abdominal pleural membrane with darkened, expanded region; tergites 7 and 8 shiny. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 250). Empis (En.) flavobulla sp. nov. is known from March and April in central California. Etymology. The species name is derived from Latin flavos for yellowish and bulla for knob, in reference to the pale yellowish halter of this species. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".