MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930570796 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13161470

Pleuretra hystrix Bartos 1950

2017· article· en· W6930570796 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHystrixTrunkPedicelRidgeSulcusDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

13. Pleuretra hystrix Bartoš, 1950 (Fig. 6) Pleuretra hystrix Bartoš, 1950, p. 290, figs. 1A-C; Donner, 1965, pp. 192-193, figs. 139a-c; Fontaneto and Melone, 2003, pp. 154-155, figs. 1-13. Philodina brycei (Weber) var.: Murray, 1908, p. 192, fig. 13. Material examined. Two specimens found in wet mosses at a stream around Daegwallyeong, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwon-do, 37°41 ʹ 19.7 ʺ N 128°45 ʹ 39.0 ʺ E, 5 June 2016. Diagnosis. Corona much wider than cingulum. Sulcus slightly narrower than pedicel width. Pedicel long. Upper lip arched and as high as sulcus base. Trunk integument rather stiff, highly granulated and with 10 prominent longitudinal ridges; each ridge ending in an acute spine in the middle of trunk. Anterodorsal margin of the first trunk pseudosegment with a pair of bifurcated projections, which flanking a dorsal antenna. Measurements. Total length in feeding 130 μm. Total length in creeping 260 μm. Greatest trunk width in creeping 60 μm. Corona width 44 μm. Cingulum width 36 μm. Sulcus width 12 μm. Spur length 6 μm. Remarks. This species is easily recognized by a pair of bifurcated projections on anterodorsal margin of the first trunk pseudosegment. The characteristics of the Korean specimens agree well with those in the original description. Fontaneto and Melone (2003) rediscovered this species in the western Italian Alps about 50 years after the original description by Bartoš (1950), and redescribed this species in detail using scanning electron micrographs, confirming the validity of it. In their faunistic survey on the global distribution of bdelloids, Fontaneto et al. (2007) suggested P. hystrix as Alpine endemic because it had been found only in the Alpine regions of Switzerland and Italy until then. Recently, its distribution has been expanded to Canada and the Arctic region by Kaya et al. (2010). This species was rediscovered from Korea in 2016 (current study), which was the first observation of this species in Asia. World distribution. The Arctic, Canada, Italy, Switzerland and Korea. Deposition. Deposited in the collection of the National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, Korea (ZIIY IV0000001552, ZIIYGR0000000004).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→