TABLE 1 in The World Catalog of Biting Midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae): Additional Updates and Errata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE 1. List of errata since Borkent et al. (2022). References are those in Borkent & Dominiak (2020) and Borkent et al. (2022) unless modified and then presented here. Previous name as in Borkent & Dominiak (2020) and Borkent et al. (2022)Corrected toAdelohelea burmiticus (Szadziewski and Poinar, 2005): 352 (Protoculicoides).Adelohelea burmitica (Szadziewski & Poinar, 2005): 352 (Protoculicoides), correct endingAlluaudomyia longzhouensis Hao and Yu, 1991: 45.Alluaudomyia longzhouensis Hao & Yu, 1993: 42, corrected date of publication & page #Alluaudomyia quinquepicina Yu and Zhang, in Yu et al. 2005 a: 1361.Alluaudomyia quinquepicina Yu & Zhang, in Yu et al. 2005 a: 1361, misspelled authorAtrichopogon uruguayense (Cordero, 1929): 95 (Lophomyidium).Atrichopogon uruguayensis (Cordero, 1929): 95 (Lophomyidium), correct endingBezzia brehmii Kieffer, 1925d: 129.Bezzia brehmii Kieffer, 1925d: 130, corrected page numberBrachypogon emeiensis Wen and Yu, in Wen et al. 1991: 30.Brachypogon emeiensis Wen & Yu, in Wen et al. 1993: 30, corrected date of publicationBrachypogon montivagus Yu and Wen, in Wen et al. 1991: 35.Brachypogon montivagus Yu & Wen, in Wen et al. 1993: 35, corrected date of publicationBrachypogon neotericus Yu and Zhang, in Wen et al. 1991: 32.Brachypogon neotericus Yu & Zhang, in Wen et al. 1993: 32, corrected date of publicationBrachypogon sylvaticus Yu and Liu, in Wen et al. 1991: 35.Brachypogon sylvaticus Yu & Liu, in Wen et al. 1993: 35, corrected date of publicationCeratopogon arakawai Sen and Gupta, 1959: 624.unjustified emendation of Culicoides arakawae (Arakawa, 1910): 411 (Ceratopogon, as arakanae, misspelling)Ceratopogon barbipes Gimmerthal, 1846: 102. (nomen dubium in family)Ceratopogon barbipes Gimmerthal, 1845: 102, corrected dateCulicoides aequalispinus Nandi, Mazumdar and Das Gupta, 2013: 224.Culicoides aequalispinus Nandi, Mazumdar & Das Gupta, 2014: 224, corrected date of publicationCulicoides bipalus Yu, 1991: 52.Culicoides bipalus Yu & Deng, in Yu, 1993: 52, corrected authorship & date of publicationCulicoides filariferus Hoffman, 1939: 172.Culicoides filarifera Hoffman, 1939: 172, corrected endingCulicoides fluvaitilis Xiang and Yu, in Ma et al. 1990: 47.Culicoides fluviatilis Xiang & Yu, in Ma et al. 1990: 47, misspellingCulicoides fuscitibialis Nandi, Mazumdar and Das Gupta, 2013: 226.Culicoides fuscitibialis Nandi, Mazumdar & Das Gupta, 2014: 226, corrected date of publicationCulicoides heliophilus Edwards, 1921: 124.Culicoides heliophilus Edwards, 1921a: 60, corrected reference and page numberCulicoides jucundus Statz, 1944: 147.Culicoides jucundus Statz, 1941: 5 (1944: 147), earlier publication with descriptionCulicoides pallidulus Yu, 1991: 52.Culicoides pallidulus Yu & Deng, in Yu, 1993: 52, corrected authorship & date of publicationCulicoides pateli Nandi, Mazumdar and Das Gupta, 2013: 228.Culicoides pateli Nandi, Mazumdar & Das Gupta, 2014: 228, corrected date of publicationCulicoides pseudolangeroni Kremer, Chaker and Delécolle, 1981: 291.Culicoides pseudolangeroni Kremer, Chaker & Delécolle, 1982: 291, corrected date of publicationCulicoides sacrilegus Xue and Yu, 1991: 53.Culicoides sacrilegus Xue & Yu, 1991: 53, corrected date of publicationDasyhelea flaviventris Santos Abreu, 1918: 292 (Culicoides) (as syn. of abreui).missing from the indexDasyhelea psseudohama Brahma and Hazra, 2018: 354.Dasyhelea pseudohama Brahma & Hazra, 2018: 354, misspellingDasyhelea santaemarthae (Kieffer, 1917b): 306 (Culicoides).Dasyhelea sanctaemarthae (Kieffer, 1917b): 306 (Culicoides, as sanctae-marthae, misspellingEohelea indica Stebner and Szadziewski, 2017: 5.Eohelea indica Stebner & Szadziewski, in Stebner et al. 2017: 5.Forcipomyia conogensis Goetghebuer, 1933: 132.Forcipomyia congoensis Goetghebuer, 1933: 132, incorrect original spelling of congolensisForcipomyia fuliginosa (Wiedemann, in Meigen, 1818): 86 (Ceratopogon).Forcipomyia fuliginosa (Meigen & Wiedemann, in Meigen, 1818): 86 (Ceratopogon), corrected authorshipForcipomyia fusciparamera Szadziewski and Grogan, 1998b: 266.Forcipomyia fusiparamera Szadziewski & Grogan, 1998b: 266, corrected spellingForcipomyia lochmocola Zou and Yu, 1991: 57.Forcipomyia lochmocola Zou & Yu, 1993: 57, corrected date of publicationGedanohelea gerdesorum Stebner and Szadziewski, 2017: 6.Gedanohelea gerdesorum Stebner & Szadziewski, in Stebner et al. 2017: 6.Lasiobezzia Kieffer, 1925d: 54.Reference corrected in textLasiohelea quinlongxia Yu, 2019: 35.Lasiohelea qinlongxia Yu, 2019b: 35, misspellingLeptoconops montigenus Clastrier, 1981b: 123.Leptoconops montigena Clastrier, 1981b: 123, corrected endingMeunierohelea borkenti Stebner and Szadziewski, 2017: 10.Meunierohelea borkenti Stebner & Szadziewski, in Stebner et al. 2017: 10.Meunierohelea cambayana Stebner and Szadziewski, 2017: 9.Meunierohelea cambayana Stebner & Szadziewski, in Stebner et al. 2017: 9, corrected citationMeunierohelea fundalai Szadziewski, Sontag and Bojarski, 2020: 286.Meunierohelea fudalai Szadziewski, Sontag & Bojarski, 2020: 286, misspellingMeunierohelea orientalis Stebner and Szadziewski, 2017: 12.Meunierohelea orientalis Stebner & Szadziewski, in Stebner et al. 2017: 12.Nemoromyia Liu and Yu, 1991: 25.Nemoromyia Liu & Yu, 1993: 25, corrected date of publicationNemoromyia nemorosa Liu and Yu, 1991: 26 (Nemoromyia).Nemoromyia nemorosa Liu & Yu, 1993: 26 (Nemoromyia), corrected date of publicationPaleoconops in index of Borkent & Dominiak (2020).Palaeoconops, misspellingPalpomyia erythrocephala (Staeger, 1839): 579 (Ceratopogon).Palpomyia erythrocephala (Staeger, 1839): 597 (Ceratopogon), corrected page numberPalpomyia flaviventris (Czerny and Strobl, 1909): 130 (Ceratopogon, as variety of flavipes Meigen).Palpomyia flaviventris (Strobl, in Czerny & Strobl, 1909): 130 (Ceratopogon, as variety of flavipes Meigen), corrected authorshipPalpomyia nemorosa Liu and Yu, 1991: 26 (Nemoromyia).Palpomyia nemorosa Liu & Yu, 1993: 26 (Nemoromyia), corrected date of publicationParadasyhelea egregria (Macfie, 1932c): 36 (Dasyhelea).Paradasyhelea egregia (Macfie, 1932c): 36 (Dasyhelea), misspellingProbezzia varipes Curtis, 1829: plate 285.Probezzia varipes (Curtis, 1829): plate 285 (Sphaeromias), missing original genus nameSerromyia austera Statz, 1944: 150.Serromyia austera Statz, 1941: 6 (1944: 150), earlier publication with descriptionSerromyia spinofemorata Statz, 1944: 151.Serromyia spinofemorata Statz, 1941: 6 (1944: 151), earlier publication with descriptionStilobezzia wudangshanensis Yu and Liu, 1991: 47.Stilobezzia wudangshanensis Yu & Liu, 1993: 47, corrected date of publication ......continued on the next page
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.469 | 0.343 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".