Novel Endpoint Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Terrestrial Acidification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This repository contains Excel files with the characterization factorsand the soil response factors for the publication entitled "Novel Endpoint Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Terrestrial Acidification", published in the "Journal of Ecological Indicators" . Content: Datasets.zip is an folder containing the following Excel files: CF_Terrestrial_Acidification_2024-08-01.xlsx with the following sheets Dataframe gathering terrestrial acidification marginal endpoint CF [PDF.yr/kg_emitted] values at country level (with the world average value), for 3 acidifying substances (NOx, NHx, SOx) at global and regional impact scales (with and without the inclusion of the Global Extinction Probability - GEP - respectively) Calc Info summing up calculation informations Calc Table registering input parameters used to run the calculations leading to the Dataframe sheet (substance used, original and adapted resolutions for emission and deposition compartments, resolutions for each CF components and spatial transformations, GEP normalization method) RF_NO3_2024-03-27.xlsx with the following sheet: RFs containing the soil response values [(molH+ / L).(yr / kg_dep)] at ecoregion level (referred to as "idTarget") for a marginal increase of 10% in NO3 deposition rate. It also gathers the intermediate results leading the final RFs (sustances' deposition rates, reference and post-deposition increase pHs) RF_NH4_2024-03-25.xlsx with the following sheet: RFs containing the soil response values [(molH+ / L).(yr / kg_dep)] at ecoregion level (referred to as "idTarget") for a marginal increase of 10% in NH4 deposition rate. It also gathers the intermediate results leading the final RFs (sustances' deposition rates, reference and post-deposition increase pHs) RF_SO4_2024-03-25.xlsx with the following sheet: RFs containing the soil response values [(molH+ / L).(yr / kg_dep)] at ecoregion level (referred to as "idTarget") for a marginal increase of 10% in SO4 deposition rate. It also gathers the intermediate results leading the final RFs (sustances' deposition rates, reference and post-deposition increase pHs)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".