Table 1 in Morphological and molecular analysis of Willowsia nigromaculata (Collembola, Entomobryidae, Entomobryinae) reveals a new cryptic species from the United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Table 1 (continued on next page). List of Entomobryinae species used for phylogenetic analysis, including locality and COI sequence information, i.e., GenBank accession number and sequence length (bp = base pairs). Abbreviations: AH = Anhui;, AL = Alabama; AM = Amazonas; AZ = Azores; BA = Bahia; BR = Brazil; CA = Canada; CH = China; FL = Florida; FR = France; GD = Guangdong; HB = Hubei; HN = Hunan; IDF = Île-de-France; IL = Illinois; JL = Jilin; NC = North Carolina; OOC = Occitanie; ON = Ontario; PA = Pennsylvania; PI = Piauí; PT = Portugal; TB = Tibet; TN = Tennessee; USA = United States of America, VT = Vermont; WI = Wisconsin; ZJ = Zhejiang. Species nameLocalityGenBank #bpReference1Coecobrya tenebricosaAntony, IDF, FRKM978347658Ding et al. 20182Drepanura mogolicaChangling, JL, CHKY468329658Ding et al. 20183Entomobrya assutaMason Co., IL, USAKM6100571534Katz et al. 2015a4Entomobrya atrocinctaChampaign Co., IL, USAKM6101151534Katz et al. 2015a5Entomobrya bicolorHenderson Co., IL, USAKM6101171534Katz et al. 2015a6Entomobrya citrensisCitrus Co., FL, USAKM6100641534Katz et al. 2015a7Entomobrya clitellariaColes Co., IL, USAKM6100761534Katz et al. 2015a8Entomobrya decemfasciataStewart Co., TN, USAKM6101011534Katz et al. 2015a9Entomobrya huangiNyingchi, TB, CHKY468314658Ding et al. 201810Entomobrya intermediaChester Co., PA, USAKM6101211534Katz et al. 2015a11Entomobrya jubataCovington Co., AL, USAKM6101101534Katz et al. 2015a12Entomobrya ligataSwain Co., NC, USAKM6100791534Katz et al. 2015a13Entomobrya multifasciataSão Miguel Island, AZ, PTKM6101231534Katz et al. 2015a14Entomobrya neotenicaClay Co., AL, USAKM6101041534Katz et al. 2015a15Entomobrya nivalisLamoille Co., VT, USAKM6101251534Katz et al. 2015a16Entomobrya quadrilineataVermilion Co., IL, USAKM6100921534Katz et al. 2015a17Entomobrya unifasciataChester Co., PA, USAKM6100871534Katz et al. 2015a18Entomobrya unostrigataChampaign Co., IL, USAMT4541111530Katz et al. 2015b19Entomobryoides dissimilisChampaign Co., IL, USAKM6101261534Katz et al. 2015a20Homidia sauteriButler Co., AL, USAKM6101271501Katz et al. 2015a21Homidia sociaJo Davies Co., IL, USAKM6101281534Katz et al. 2015a22Lepidocyrtoides caeruleomaculatusRio Preto da Eva, AM, BRMF7166181534Godeiro et al. 202023Lepidocyrtoides sp.Abaíra, BA, BRMF7165981534Godeiro et al. 202024Lepidodens similisShaoguan, GD, CHKM978396658Ding et al. 201825Lepidosira neotropicalisPiracuruca, PI, BRMF7166031534Nunes et al. 201926Sinhomidia bicolorHuangshan, AH, CHKM978375658Ding et al. 201827Willowsia buskiSauk Co., WI, USAKM6101291534Katz et al. 2015a28Willowsia fasciaHuanggang, HB, CHKU833222658Ding et al. 201829Willowsia guangdongensisGuangzhou, GD, CHKM978377658Ding et al. 201830Willowsia japonicaLinhai, ZJ, CHKM978378658Ding et al. 201835Willowsia neonigromaculata sp. nov.Pope Co., IL, USAKM6101301534Katz et al. 2015a36Willowsia neonigromaculata sp. nov.Brockville, ON, CAMG034057542deWaard et al. 201931Willowsia nigromaculataTeillet, OCC, FRKY468311658Ding et al. 201832Willowsia nigromaculataToronto, ON, CAMG032239474deWaard et al. 201933Willowsia nigromaculataToronto, ON, CAMG036766594deWaard et al. 201934Willowsia nigromaculataToronto, ON, CAMG039377543deWaard et al. 201937Willowsia pseudobuskiLu’an, AH, CHKU833223658Ding et al. 201838Willowsia pyrrhopygiaCitrus Co., FL, USAKM6101311534Katz et al. 2015a39Willowsia quiHuangshan, AH, CHKU833221658Ding et al. 201840Willowsia similisChangsha, HN, CHKU833225658Ding et al. 2018
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".