MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930642580 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14206107

Trichoderma viridistromatis E. Tarafder & F. H. Tian 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6930642580 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)ConidiumAscocarpHolotypeHypocreales

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trichoderma viridistromatis E. Tarafder & F. H. Tian sp. nov. Figs 5, 6 Diagnosis. Trichoderma viridistromatis differs from T. aerugineum by its smaller stromata (0.5–2 mm diam, to ca. 1 mm thick in T. aerugineum) and bigger phialides measuring 7–23 × 2.4–4 μm in T. aerugineum. In addition, it is easily distinguished from T. strophariensis by its smaller ascospores (3.4–5.6 × 2.4–3.3 µm) and conidia (2.8–4 × 1.7–3.2 μm). Phylogenetically, T. viridistromatis forms a distinct clade and is closely related to T. strophariensis, T. britannicum, and T. aerugineum with 100 % ML and 0.90 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 1). Holotype. HGUP 24-0004. Etymology. The epithet “ viridistromatis ” refers to an entirely green-colored stroma. Description. Stromata, when fresh 1–7 mm in diam., 0.5–2 mm thick (n = 10), mostly gregarious, aggregated, discoid or undulate, becoming pulvinate, compact; outline circular to oblong; margin attached or free, surface smooth when immature without ostiolar dots, with yellowish margin and pale red, depressed center when young, becoming reddish with rugose surface when mature. Outline circular, oblong or irregularly lobed. Surface smooth, tubercular or rugose, when young finely velvety. Ostiolar dots absent, ostiolar openings sometimes visible, (16 –) 20–30 (– 32) μm (n = 30) wide, inconspicuous, pale, more distinct and shinier after rehydration. Ostioles (18 –) 24–30 (– 45) μm long, plane with the surface, (8 –) 12–19 (– 23) μm wide at the apex (n = 30). Ascomata (69 –) 75–85 (– 96) × (36 –) 41–55 (– 60) μm (n = 30), numerous, 5–7 per mm stroma length, sub-globose or flask-shaped. Peridium (7 –) 11–19 (– 22) μm (n = 60) thick at the base and sides; hyaline to pale yellowish. Asci (63 –) 74–81 (– 85) × (3.2 –) 4.2–5 (– 5.5) μm, stipe (4 –) 5–11 (– 14) μm (n = 30) long, containing 16 - ascospores, apex not thickened, hyaline, cylindrical. Ascospores (3.4 –) 3.6–4.3 (– 5.6) × (2.4 –) 2.8–3.1 (– 3.3) μm, l / w 1–1.1 (– 1.2) (n = 34), hyaline, verruculose, single-celled, non-septate, sub-globose, oblong or slightly tapered downwards, thick-walled. Culture characteristics. Optimal growth at 25 ° C on all media, poor and limited growth at 30 ° C, no growth at 35 ° C. Although MEA exhibited good growth, precultures were made on it. On MEA and PDA, growth is slow, colony is creamy white, finely farinose by scant effuse conidiation; on PDA, reverse brownish, surface turning greenish-brown. On MEA at 25 ° C after five days colony radius 5–7 mm; colony circular, dense, thick, first whitish, becoming zonate after a few weeks, turning olive-green to brown with yellow-greenish, farinose center; conidiation effuse, on short odd verticillium like conidiophores. On SNA colony radius at 25 ° C after 2 weeks 6–9 mm; colony dense, hyaline, turning greenish or olivaceous from conidia. Conidiation following growth, effuse, on aerial hyphae and short odd verticillium-like conidiophores, spreading from the plug. Conidiophores simple, 1–4 level, are branched and tapered at the tips, bearing few asymmetric side branches, terminated by solitary phialides of 2–3 divergent phialides. Phialides (5.5 –) 7–10 (– 14) × (1.6 –) 2.5–2.9 (– 3.5) μm (n = 32), mostly gregarious, lageniform, less commonly subfusiform, not thickest near the base. Conidia (2.8 –) 3.1–3.7 (– 4) × (1.7 –) 2.2–2.7 (– 3.2) μm (n = 70), variable shape and size, typically oblong and pale yellowish green when fully mature, oval, ellipsoid and hyaline when immature, straight or slightly curved, sides sometimes pinched, smooth; base often truncate. Habitat. On mushroom cultivated field, associated with Stropharia rugosoannulata. Distribution. China, Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, and Liupanshui City; Guizhou City in Anshun Province. Material examined. China • Guizhou, Liupanshui City, Shuicheng District, 24°55'39.936"N, 121°11'30.264"E, on soil surfaces of Stropharia rugosoannulata cultivated field, 16 - November- 2023, E. Tarafder and F. H. Tian (HGUP 24-0004, holotype); ex-type living cultures GUCC TB 1120, GUCC TB 1121 and GUCC TB 1122. GenBank accession numbers. GUCC TB 1120 (ITS: PP 922277; rpb 2: PP 954944; tef 1 - α: PP 954950); GUCC TB 1121 (ITS: PP 926290; rpb 2: PP 954945; tef 1 - α: PP 954951); GUCC TB 1122 (ITS: PP 922285; rpb 2: PP 954946; tef 1 - α: PP 954952) Notes. Morphologically, our newly described taxon Trichoderma viridistromatis shares common characteristics with T. aerugineum (CBS 120541) and T. britannicum, a species previously isolated from dead stems and leaves of Calamagrostis epigejos. However, T. viridistromatis differs from T. aerugineum by having smaller stromata (0.5–2 mm in diameter, compared to ca. 1 mm thick in T. aerugineum) and larger phialides (7–23 × 2.4–4 μm in T. aerugineum) and ascospores (8–12 × 4–6 µm; Table 4) (Chaverri and Samuels 2004). Additionally, it can be distinguished from T. strophariensis by its larger stromata (1–14 mm in diameter, 1–11 mm thick in T. strophariensis) and significantly larger subglobose to elongated ascospores (8.4–16.9 × 5.5–8.1 µm). In comparison, T. britannicum has discoid, convex to turbinate stromata surrounded by light brown radial mycelium and much larger one-celled ascospores (10–16 × 4.5–6.2 μm; Table 4) (Jaklitsch et al. 2014). The phylogenetic positions of the new taxon (Fig. 2) demonstrated that Trichoderma viridistromatis is closely related to T. strophariensis, T. britannicum, and T. aerugineum, with strong statistical support (Fig. 2). However, our isolate differs from T. britannicum with 3 % (17 / 610 nucleotides, with five gaps) in ITS region, 2 % (20 / 1080 nucleotides, no gaps) in rpb 2 gene, and 4 % (55 / 1244 nucleotides, twenty-one gaps) in tef 1 - α gene. Moreover, the difference in our collections with T. aerugineum is more than 2 % (10 / 610 nucleotides, ten gaps) in the ITS region, 7 % (79 / 1080 nucleotides, no gaps) in the rpb 2 gene, and 6 % (78 / 1244 nucleotides, eleven gaps) in tef 1 - α gene (Table 2). Additionally, the differences between our isolate with T. strophariensis are 4 % (29 / 610 nucleotides, four gaps) in ITS region, 4 % (46 / 1080 nucleotides, no gaps) differences in rpb 2 gene, and 5 % (65 / 1244 nucleotides, twenty-five gaps) differences in tef 1 - α gene also supported T. viridistromatis to be a distinct species compared to T. strophariensis and T. britannicum respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→