Dolichogenidea aceituno Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolichogenidea aceituno Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Fig. 6 A – H Type material. Holotype. Chile • Female, CNC; Atacama, Chanaral de Aceituno; 12.x.1958; L. E. Pena leg.; Voucher code: CNC 1196525. Paratypes. Chile • 3 Males, CNC; CNC 1196544, CNC 1196545, CNC 1196567. Diagnostic description. Face rostriformis (malar space longer than mandible width) and with slightly elongate mouth parts; T 1 and T 2 entirely smooth and shiny; T 1 very broad at posterior margin, almost quadrate, its length 1.05 × its width at posterior margin; ovipositor sheath 1.5 × metatibia length; fore wing veins mostly transparent; pterostigma mostly yellow but with brown margins; palpi, tegula and humeral complex dark brown; all coxae black to dark brown; profemur dark brown on posterior half, meso- and metafemora entirely dark brown; body length: 3.70 mm; fore wing length: 3.90 mm. Among all species with smooth T 1 and T 2, D. aceituno is very distinctive because of its elongate face and mouth parts, dark coloration of coxae and femora and broad T 1. Distribution. Chile. Biology. No host data available. DNA barcoding data. No data. Etymology. Named after the type locality, the Chañaral de Aceituno, in the Chanaral Island (Isla Chanaral) where the Pingüino de Humboldt National Reserve, an important nature reserve for marine wildlife, is located.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".