Rhaphitelus maculatus Walker 1834
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rhaphitelus maculatus Walker, 1834 Fig. 18 Rhaphitelus maculatus Walker, 1834: 179. Holotype female (Natural History Museum, London, not examined). Note. For synonymy, see UCD Community (2025). Material examined. Other material: South Korea • 1 ♀; Gyeongsangnam-do, Geochang-gun, Namsang-myeon, Jeoncheok-ri, 35°37'15.3"N, 127°57'51.4"E, reared from Cryphalus fulvus Niisima on Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc., 22.VI.2023, coll. E. Tselikh, J. Lee, S. Belokobylskij; (NIBR). Distribution. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Egypt, England, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Republic of Korea (new record), Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, Uzbekistan (Tselikh 2010, 2019; UCD Community 2025). Biology. Primary ectoparasitoids of beetles from the subfamily Scolytinae (Curculionidae); possible secondary parasitoids of Braconidae (UCD Community 2025). The bark beetle Cryphalus fulvus Niisima is reported as a host for Rhaphitelus maculatus Walker for the first time. Remarks. The genus Rhaphitelus Walker, 1834 is recorded here for the first time for the Korean Peninsula.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".