MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930707672 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13774458

Camptomyia multinoda

2024· article· en· W6930707672 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA barcodingIdentification (biology)CecidomyiidaeNinthTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camptomyia multinoda (Felt, 1908) agg. Morphological identification Jaschhof & Jaschhof (2013). DNA barcode CO1 sequences (651‒696bp) of the 73 specimens listed below were assigned to five different BINs, namely BOLD:AEW6793 (one specimen), BOLD:AER0301 (eight), BOLD:AEY2389 (one), BOLD:AEY8233 (five), and BOLD:ACU9836 (58). Search on BOLD’s BIN Database retrieved a further match for BOLD:ACU9836, as Cecidomyiidae sp. from Canada (accessed 26 Aug. 2023). The occurrence of this BIN in North America might indicate that this is the genuine C. multinoda, a species originally described from Illinois, USA (Felt 1908). A further match was also retrieved for BOLD:AEW6793, as Cecidomyiidae sp. from Norway (accessed 26 Aug. 2023). My reexamination of the DNA barcoded specimens from Germany revealed slight morphological distinctions in support of the genetic clustering found here, which concern the gonostylus, the parameres, and the ninth tergite. However, individual variation, which no doubt occurs in these structures too, were found to blur intercluster distinctions. Also, there is the disturbing fact that the specimens assigned here to five different clusters come from the same site. One wonders what picture of genetic variation DNA barcoding would draw once multiple samples of morphotypical C. multinoda from different parts of the vast distribution area were subjected to analysis. For the time being I consider C. multinoda an aggregate species in need of further research. Material examined BOLD:AEW6793 GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′26″ E; elev. 112 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; windthrow of willow and aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8800-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-E12. BOLD:AER0301 GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′28″ N, 8°33′35″ E; elev. 111 m; 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; willow scrub and reed; BOLD DTIII8678-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-C09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′26″ E; elev. 112 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; windthrow of willow and aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8775-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-C11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 17‒24 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8712-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-F07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8724-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-A01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8741-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8748-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-A08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′44″ N, 8°33′22″ E; 10‒17 May 2020; windthrow of aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8829-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-H05 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8836-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-A01. BOLD:AEY2389 GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′28″ N, 8°33′35″ E; elev. 111 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; willow scrub and reed; BOLD DTIII8603-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-E05. BOLD:AEY8233 GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′28″ N, 8°33′35″ E; elev. 111 m; 17‒24 May 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; willow scrub and reed; BOLD DTIII8546-22; ZSM-DIP-42474-H07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′26″ E; elev. 112 m; 29 Mar.‒12 Apr. 2020; windthrow of willow and aspen trees; ZSM-DIP-42477-C05 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 12‒26 Apr. 2020; BOLD DTIII8790-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-E02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8651-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8664-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-B07. BOLD:ACU9836 GERMANY ‒ Baden-Württemberg • 1 ♂; Malsch, Luderbusch; 48°91′31″ N, 8°33′25″ E; elev. 117 m; 31 May‒7 Jun. 2020; D. Doczkal and K. Grabow leg.; Malaise trap; south-facing hill slope; BOLD GBDTA9977-21; ZSM-DIP-42304-A02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′61″ N, 8°33′18″ E; elev. 111 m; 12‒26Apr. 2020; windthrow of birch trees; BOLD GBDTA9990-21; ZSM-DIP-42304-B03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 10‒17 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8873-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-D02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′44″ N, 8°33′24″ E; elev. 112 m; 3‒10 May 2020; willow/ aspen forest and game browsing field; BOLD GBDTA10142-21; ZSM-DIP-42305-F12 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′28″ N, 8°33′35″ E; elev. 111 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; willow scrub and reed; BOLD DTIII8592-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-D06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 17‒24 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8535-22; ZSM-DIP-42474-G08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8551-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-A01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′26″ E; elev. 112 m; 12‒26 Apr. 2020; windthrow of willow and aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8772; ZSM-DIP-42477-C08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8773; ZSM-DIP-42477-C09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8774-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-C10 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8787-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-D11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8795-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-E07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; BOLD DTI8629-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-G07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTI8631-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-G09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTI8633-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-G11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTI8635-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-H01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTI8641-22; ZSM-DIP-42475-H07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8646-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8647-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8648-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8650-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A05 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8652-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A07 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8654-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8655-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A10 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8657-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-A12 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8659-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-B02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8660-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-B03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8702-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-E09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8703-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-E10 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8706-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-F01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8713-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-F08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8715-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-F10 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8718-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8719-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8720; ZSM-DIP-42476-G03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8721-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G04 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8723-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8726-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8728-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-G11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8730-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-H01 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8733-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-H04 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8735-22; ZSM-DIP-42476-H06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8743-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-A03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 10‒17 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8855-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-B08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8856-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-B09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8858-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-B11 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8859-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-B12 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8862-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-C03 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8864-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-C05 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8865-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-C06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8868-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-C09 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 48°91′24″ N, 8°33′51″ E; elev. 118 m; 10‒17 May 2020; windthrow of beech trees; BOLD DTIII8763-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-B11 • 1 ♂, same data as for preceding but 48°91′20″ N, 8°33′22″ E; elev. 112 m; 26 Apr.‒3 May 2020; windthrow of aspen trees; BOLD DTIII8897-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-F02 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8913-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-G06 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8915-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-G08 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding; BOLD DTIII8919-22; ZSM-DIP-42478-G12 • 1 ♂; same data as for preceding but 10‒17 May 2020; BOLD DTIII8835-22; ZSM-DIP-42477-H11 ° Distribution Germany (new record); widespread in Palearctic, USA (Gagné & Jaschhof 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquaculture disease management and microbiota→French-language works237,207→