Phytomyza (Phytomyza) syngenesiae Hardy 1849
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytomyza (Phytomyza) syngenesiae Hardy, 1849 (Fig. 30) Chromatomyia syngenesiae Hardy, 1849: 391. Material examined. SAUDI ARABIA: 1♂, 1♀, Riyadh, ex leaves of Sonchus oleraceus L. mines, 10.1.1979, collector unspecified (NMWC). Turkey: 2♂, 3♂, Izmir Province, ÖdemiŞ, 13.v.1998, weedy pea field, J.C. Deeming (NMWC). Distribution. Previously recorded from Saudi Arabia by Deeming (2006). This species was described without type-locality being specified. It is a Holarctic species, native to Europe. It was recorded from the Afrotropical Region; Kenya, Saudi Arabia: Palaearctic Region; Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and former Yugoslavia: Australasian Region; Australia and New Zealand: Oriental Region; India (Tamil Nadu), Sri Lanka: Nearctic Region; Canada, USA (Papp 1984a; Wijesekara 2002; Deeming 2006; Kahanpää 2014; Černý & von Tschirnhaus 2014; Černý et al. 2018; Eiseman & Londale 2018; Murugasridevi et al. 2021). Host remarks. This is a polyphagous leaf-miner attacking species in the family Asteraceae including Sonchus L. (Benavent-Corai et al. 2005), and other host families e.g., Fabaceae, Laminaceae and Mavaceae. In Europe this species is a pest of the lettuce crop (Lactuca sativa L.) (Asteraceae) and chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum indicum L.) (Asteraceae) (Deeming 2006). An account of the taxonomy, biology, distribution, host plants, control, damage caused and parasitoids attacking this species is given in detail by Lonsdale et al. (2023).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".