Phytomyza plantaginis Robineau-Desvoidy 1851
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytomyza plantaginis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1851 Material examined. Morocco. • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Rif, Ametrasse, Oued Ametrasse; 30 Apr. 2016; F. Z. Bahid leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 16/11. • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Rif, Talassemtane, Place Espagna (NPTL); 16 Apr. 2018; K. Kettani leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 18/22. • 1 ♂; Rif, Bouhachem, Amsemlil (PNPB); 1 July 2019; K. Kettani leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 19/34. • 2 ♂♂; Atlantic Plain, Sidi Yahya Gharb, forest of Sidi Yahya Gharb; 4 May 2020; M. Doukale leg.; sweep net; LESCB -AP 20/35. • 2 ♂♂; Rif, Talembote, Oued Talembote (NPTL); 1 July 2018; K. Kettani leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 18/27. • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Rif, Tétouan, Khemis Anjra; 27 Mar. 2021; L. Zouhair leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 21/37. • 1 ♂; Rif, Talassemtane, Maison forestière (NPTL); 10 June 2021; K. Menouar & L. Zouhair leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 21/41. • 3 ♂♂; Rif, Afeska, Oued Afeska (NPTL); 10 June 2021; K. Menouar & L. Zouhair leg.; sweep net; LESCB -R 21/40. Distribution. It is recorded from Canada: BC *, ON, QC. USA: Widespread, including HI. Bermuda *. Widespread in Europe, recorded from almost every country including Azores, Canary Islands, Cyprus, Italy, Portugal including Madeira. In the Palaearctic, recorded also from Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tunisia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan. It is recorded also from South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, and Thailand. First record from Morocco. Habitat. This species exhibits a large distribution in the Rif Region of northern Morocco across a wide altitudinal range (11–1683 m) and inhabits a large variety of habitats such as the edge of wetlands (river, peat bog), mixed forest dominated by oak (Quercus suber, Quercus canariensis), fir (Abies marocana), and cedar (Cedrus atlantica) at high altitudes and some other vegetation such Tetraclinis articulata, Eucalyptus globulus, Scolymus maculatus, and Carlina corymbosa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".