Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atheta irrita Casey, 1911 Fig 40, Map 40 New Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, Carleton Co., Meduxnekeag River Valley Nature Preserve, 46.1940°N, 67.6800°W, 20.VI.2006, 23.VI.2006 (3 ♁, 1 ♀, RWC); Meduxnekeag River Valley Nature Preserve, 46.1927°N, 67.6803°W, 6.VII.2006 (2 ♁, RWC). Queens Co., McAlpines near Upper Hampstead Rd., 45.7250°N, 66.1200°W, 26.VI.2008, S. Makepeace and R.P. Webster (1 ♁, RWC); Rees, near Grand Lake, 46.0016°N, 65.9466°W, 29.V.2007, S. Makepeace and R.P. Webster (1 ♁, NBM). Sunbury Co., near Sunpoke Lake, 45.7658°N, 66.5546°W, 20.VI.2007 (1 ♀, RWC). Westmorland Co., Sackville, near Ogden Mill, 45.9216°N, 64.3893°W, 12.V.2006, S. Makepeace (2 ♁, 3 ♀, NBM, RWC). York Co., Graham Corner, 45.8565°N, 67.7083°W, 26.VI.2007, S. Makepeace and R.P. Webster (1 ♁, NBM); Marysville, 45.9750°N, 66.5700°W, 22.VI.2007, S. Makepeace and R.P. Webster (1 ♀, NBM). Bionomic Notes. Atheta irrita was a common inhabitant of the nests of barred owls, which nest in tree holes (usually in large trees) or artificial nest boxes. Adults Map 40. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Atheta irrita. occurred in the nest contents that usually consisted of rich decaying organic material with bones, fur, owl pellets, portions of dead prey items (mice, squirrels, small birds), and the contents often had a strong urine smell. Th is species was also found in the nest contents of the great horned owl. Majka et al. (2006a) reported this species from the nests of the boreal owl and northern saw-whet owl in Nova Scotia. Atheta irrita was also found at several sites in New Brunswick in Pleurotus sp. (oyster mushrooms) in the early stages of decay on dead standing trembling aspen trees in oak forests and mixed forests. Th is data suggests that A. irrita is associated with decaying organic material on standing trees. Adults were collected in May and June. Collection method: sifting. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. QC, NB, NS (Majka et al. 2006a; Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.117 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".