Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sclerocoelus clarae (Papp, 1973) Limosina clarae Papp, 1973: 388. Limosina clarae – Papp 1984: 96. Sclerocoelus clarae – Roháček et al. 2001: 249. Material examined No material of “ Sclerocoelus clarae ” was examined. Distribution Palaearctic: Mongolia. Remarks Roháček et al. (2001) tentatively treated this species as a Sclerocoelus based on the brief description and figures of female terminalia in Papp (1973), but it differs from all other species of Sclerocoelus in having a narrow alula, four subequal interfrontal bristles, and an upcurved R 4+5 ending far from the apex of the wing. Papp (1973) noted the presence of a midventral and apicoventral seta on the mid tibia, but did not specify if this was present in just the female (as is typical of all Sclerocoelus) or if this was present in both sexes (other male Sclerocoelus have a double row of apicoventral setae and no midventral). It seems unlikely that Sclerocoelus occurs in Central Asia, and we prefer to treat this species as incertae sedis pending further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".