TABLE 1 in Monoecocestus (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) diversity in Sigmodontinae rodents characterized by morphology and molecular methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE 1. Morphological characters and measures (mm) of Monoecocestus spp. rodent parasites. SpeciesM. americanusM. andersoniM. anoplocephaloidesM. centroovariumM. diplomysM. eljefeM. erethizonthisM. giganticusM. gundlachiAuthor(Stiles 1895) Fuhrman, 1932Haverkost & Gardner, 2010(Douthitt 1915) Smith, 1951Dronen, Pitts & Smolen, 1994Noble & Tesh, 1974Haverkost & Gardner, 2010Beddard, 1914Buhler, 1970Vigueras, 1943ReferenceRêgo 1961Haverkost & Gardner 2010Rêgo 1961Dronen et al. 1994Noble & Tesh 1974Haverkost & Gardner 2010Rêgo 1961Buhler 1970Rêgo 1961CountriesUnited States; Canada; BrazilBoliviaUnited StatesUnited StatesPanamaBoliviaUnited States; Canada; BrazilUnited StatesCubaHosts speciesErethizon dorsatum; E. epixanthum (Erethizontidae)Graomys domorum (Cricetidae)Geomys breviceps (Geomyidae)Geomys attwateri (Geomyidae)Diplomys labilis (Echimyidae)Galea musteloides (Caviidae)Erethizon dorsatum; E. epixanthum (Erethizontidae)Erethizon dorsatum (Erethizontidae)Capromys pilorides (Capromyidae)Strobila length7799–11230–3328–3918096–167–139–203150–180Scolex width0.74–0.830.42–0.430.390.24–0.300.360.28–0.360.87–0.9311.50.51–0.68Scolex length0.60–0.710.18–0.190.320.19–0.230.250.12–0.190.770.50–0.570.41–0.52Sucker size0.26–0.280.14–0.150.02–0.040.10–0.110.130.11–0.170.26–0.290.21–290.19–0.24Mature proglottids width6.8–8.203.48–3.881.7–20.93–12–41.14–1.609.21–10.054.5–86.5Mature proglottids length0.83–1.440.40–0.54–0.36–0.370.20–10.33–0.810.77–0.830.57–0.920.75–0.90Cirrus-sac width0.18–0.190.16–0.190.12–0.140.11–0.130.180.05–0.100.26–0.290.17–0.220.2–0.21Cirrus-sac length0.48–0.560.43–0.480.27–0.370.20–0.220.400.10–0.270.68–0.740.45–0.700.7–0.8Testes size0.07–0.080.06–0.120.0350.03–0.040.04–0.070.05–0.080.080.09–0.130.048–0.064Testes number60–7058–10970–11036–3940–8038–60100–1304060–80Ovary width1.3–2.171.38–1.61–0.21–0.240.260.27–0.561.54–1.671.5–2.01.2Vitellarium width0.67–0.870.35–0.38–0.09–0.110.200.10–0.190.38–0.460.46–0.730.3Eggs size0.080.05–0.070.03–0.040.023–0.0290.0350.04–0.060.07–0.080.05–0.070.05–0.06Genital poregenerally regularirregularly alternatedgenerally regularregularly alternatingirregularly alternatedirregularly alternatedregularly alternatedregularly alternatingregularly alternated ......continued on the next page
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".