MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930823394 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4630970

Trioxys ulmi Ckrkic & Tomanovic 2021, n. sp.

2021· article· en· W6930823394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumInbreedingHost (biology)Chaetotaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trioxys ulmi Čkrkić & Tomanović, n. sp. (Figs 2; 3) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A6C5F36F-5CC4-4188-A5A9-1EC300CC562B TYPE LOCALITY. — Serbia, Belgrade, New Belgrade (44°28’47”N, 20°12’55”E). TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Serbia • 1 ♀; Belgrade, New Belgrade 44°28’47”N, 20°12’55”E; 22.VI.2017; Korana Kocić leg.; reared from T. takachihoensis on Ulmus x hollandica, slide mounted; FBUB. Paratypes. Serbia • 21 ♀, 14 ♂; same data as holotype; preserved in alcohol and slide mounted (2 ♀, 2 ♂); FBUB (17 ♀, 9 ♂); MNHN (5 ♀, 5 ♂). DISTRIBUTION. — The current known distribution of the new species is Serbia, although we suspect a much broader distribution of this species in association with T. takachihoensis / Ulmus spp. Sequences of the COI gene identical to those from Serbian specimens are also registered in Canada and Germany. ETYMOLOGY. — The name of the new species is derived from the most common host of T. takachihoensis, Ulmus spp. DIAGNOSIS. — Morphologically most similar to T. complanatus (Tomanović & Kavallieratos 2002). Transverse carinae present on dorsal surface of propodeum (Fig. 2E), irregular postmedian carinae and the beginning of a closed central areola present in some specimens (in T. complanatus transverse carinae sometimes present, but discontinuous; no signs of a central pentagonal areola). Petiole with a slight constriction behind spiracular tubercles (almost parallelsided in T. complanatus). HOST. — Tinocallis takachihoensis. REMARK Since the main diagnostic character, the sculpturing of the dorsal surface of the propodeum, varies to some extent in T. ulmi Čkrkić & Tomanović, n. sp., it is advisable to take aphid hosts (T. ulmi Čkrkić &Tomanović, n. sp. is a parasitoid of Tinocallis takachihoensis while T. complanatus mainly parasitizes aphids from the genus Therioaphis Walker, 1870 on legumes) and DNA data into account when identifying this new species. DESCRIPTION Female Head (Fig. 2A). Eyes oval, medium sized, sparsely setose. Malar space equal to 0.14-0.15 of longitudinal eye diameter, tentorial index 0.25. Clypeus oval with 4-5 setae. Maxillary palps with 4 palpomeres, labial palps with 2 palpomeres. Antenna with 11 antennomeres, filiform, setae on flagellomeres semierect, subequal to flagellomere diameter (Fig 2B). Flagellomere 1 (F1) 3.6 times as long as wide, with 0-1 longitudinal placodes. F2 2.6 times as long as wide, with 1-2 longitudinal placodes (Fig 2C). F1 1.2 times longer than F2. F3, F4 and F5 with 1-2, 0-3 and 0-4 longitudinal placodes, respectively. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum without notaulices, dorsal surface smooth (Fig. 2D). Head width/mesoscutum width ratio 1.2. Propodeum without closed central pentagonal areola (Fig. 2E). Antemedian carina very short; transverse carinae present, sometimes irregular. Postmedian carinae present and irregular in some paratypes. Fore wing (Fig. 2F). Wing length 1 mm, width 0.4 mm. Stigma triangular, 2.6 times as long as wide and 1.7 times as long as distal abscissa of R1. Wing venation reduced, fused r and RS (r&RS) visible, reaching distally as far as R1 or shorter. Metasoma. Petiole 1.45 times as long as wide at spiracles. Dorsal disc smooth, with 2-3 long setae on each side (Fig. 2G). Ovipositor sheath slightly curved downwards, length/width ratio 2.6. Prongs straight, length 0.16 mm, with 2 dorsal hairs and one claw-like apical bristle (Fig. 2H). Colour. Head brown, eyes black, mouthparts yellow. Scapus, pedicel, F1 and F2 light brown, remainder of antenna brown. Mesonotum brown, propodeum and legs light brown. Wings hyaline with brown venation. Petiole light brown, rest of metasoma, including ovipositor sheaths, brown. Body length. 1.6 mm. Male (Paratype) Head (Fig. 3A). Eyes oval, medium sized, sparsely setose. Malar space equal to 0.2 of longitudinal eye diameter, tentorial index 0.3. Clypeus oval with 2-3 setae. Maxillary palps with 4 palpomeres, labial palps with 2 palpomeres. Antenna with 13 antennomeres, filiform, setae on flagellomeres semierect, subequal to half of flagellomere diameter (Fig. 3B). Flagellomere 1 (F1) 2.3 times as long as wide, with 2-4 longitudinal placodes (Fig. 3C). F2 2.2 times as long as wide, with 1-4 longitudinal placodes. F1 subequal to F2. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum without notaulices, dorsal surface smooth (Fig. 3D). Head width/mesoscutum width ratio 1.2. Propodeum in most specimens with closed central pentagonal areola (Fig. 3E), but some rare specimens lack the areola and have irregular transverse carinae. Fore wing (Fig. 3F). Wing length 1 mm, width 0.4 mm. Stigma triangular, 2.6 times as long as wide and 2.1 times as long as distal abscissa of R1. Wing venation reduced, fused r and RS (r&RS) visible, reaching distally as far as R1 or shorter. Metasoma. Petiole with prominent spiracles, 1.5 times as long as wide at spiracles. Dorsal disc smooth, with 2 long setae on each side (Fig. 3G). Colour. Head brown, eyes black, mouthparts yellow. Scapus, pedicel, F1 and F2 light brown, remainder of antenna brown. Mesonotum and propodeum brown, legs light brown. Wings hyaline with brown venation. Petiole light brown, rest of metasoma brown (Fig. 3H). Body length. 1.5 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207