Bibliographic record
Abstract
109 Euura declinata (Förster, 1854) Figs 115, 366, 367 Nematus declinatus Förster, 1854a: 348–349. Lectotype designated by Haris (1997). Pteronus capito Konow, 1903b: 307 (key). Lectotype designated by Enslin (1916a). Diagnosis Mostly black, pterostigma pale, claws with a large subapical tooth clearly separated from apical one, or bifid, mesepisternum smooth, valvula 3 elongate, thin and gradually tapering. The most similar species is E. scotonota (character states in parentheses), from which it differs possibly by mostly black sterna (pale). Closely related is also E. excisa (claws with small subapical tooth, mesepisternum matt). Type material examined Lectotype Nematus declinatus GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♂; Aachen area; 50.77° N, 6.09° E; A. Förster leg.; ZSM, GBIFGISHym3260. Lectotype Pteronus capito GERMANY – Sachsen • ♀; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym3878. Notes The synonymy of Pteronus capito with Nematus declinatus Förster by Taeger & Blank (1998) is here accepted. The projection of tergite 8 of the type specimen of declinatus does not fit Euura clitellata or E. fallax (which was considered within the range of variability of Pachynematus fallax by Liston & Burger, 2009). Genitalia of the type specimen are unfortunately lost (Liston & Burger 2009), but the drawing by Conde (who studied the type specimen) in an unpublished manuscript on Nematinae fits best with the specimen DEI-GISHym17598 (Figs 366–367) that we consider to be conspecific with females described by Konow as Pteronus capito. The penis valve is similar to that of the closely related E. scotonota. Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.16% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.29%, is Euura scotonota. Nuclear Only one sequence available, a female with haplotypes diverging by 0%. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.89%, is Euura excisa. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, France, and Germany.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.094 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".