MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930870559 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15428189

Revolutionizing Defense: 44.0 km Missile Tracking in 47.0 Seconds with 0.0–5.0s Early Alerts and 98.7% Precision Under 0.008 Noise Missile Detection Simulation

2025· article· en· W6930870559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissileDebuggingRadarNoise (video)Tracking (education)Position (finance)QuantumMissile guidance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A groundbreaking milestone in quantum technology has been achieved with the successful completion of a quantum radar missile detection simulation. Conducted by Dr. Zuhair Ahmed and his expert team in Toronto, Canada, this simulation, executed on IBM's Sherbrooke quantum backend, demonstrates advanced multi-sensor quantum detection capabilities. The system accurately detected a missile traveling at 3.0 km/s, pinpointing its position at 44.0 km within 47.0 seconds, with early warnings issued within 0.0 to 5.0 seconds. This article details the simulation's technical achievements, including its robust performance under quantum noise, transparent debugging features, and its implications for defense applications. The work positions quantum radar as a transformative technology, offering a model for global adoption in high-stakes security contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207