Bibliographic record
Abstract
Murina eleryi Furey et al. 2009 (Figs. 3f, 4f, 5f; Tables 1, 2; Map Fig. 1d) Murina aurata: Francis et al. 1999: 233, 2010: 6; Francis 2008: 253 (part). Specimens examined from Laos ROM: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; EBD: 1 ♀ (see Appendix for details, including information from adjacent countries and the literature). Description The fur of the dorsum is banded with dark grey to blackish bases for about 25% of the length, then a paler whitish to buffy band that blends into an orange brown band, then a dark brown band. Some of the longer hairs then have golden tips for up to 15% of the length giving a gilded appearance. The ventral fur has dark grey or blackish bases for about 50% of the length, with silvery grey to white distal half. The tail membrane is sparsely covered with long yellow-brown hairs, and the feet and legs are thickly haired. The ears are small and rounded; the tragus straight, pointed and whitish. The wing membrane is inserted on the side of the toe, near the base of the claw. This is the smallest Murina in Laos (Tables 1 and 2), particularly in skull dimensions (Fig. 3f). The anterior upper premolar (P 2) is substantially shorter than the posterior premolar (P 4), while the canine is slightly longer than P 4 (Fig. 4f). In the mandible, P 2 is substantially smaller in surface area, and about 2/3 the height of P 4, while C 1 is about 50% taller than P 4 (Fig. 5f). Discussion These specimens were originally reported by Francis et al. (1999) as M. aurata Milne-Edwards 1872, based on their small size and the similarity in fur colour to the description in Hill (1983), although with some hesitation given that the canines, although small, were longer than the posterior premolars, contrary to the keys in Hill (1992). However, they agree well in both fur colour and cranial shape with the description of M. eleryi by Furey et al. (2009). Distribution and ecology Three of the specimens that we captured in Laos were found in wet evergreen montane forest in the Annamite Mountains, at an altitude of 1000–1140 m. An additional five specimens were captured during surveys in Vietnam, in Quang Nam province. Four of these were captured in premontane evergreen forest at about 830 m, but one was caught in secondary forest at the base of the hills at 200 m. Additional specimens from the ROM in southern China, together with those reported by Furey et al. (2009) suggest it may be widely distributed through Vietnam and adjacent areas of Laos, though possibly largely in montane regions (Fig. 1d).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".