MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930881964 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15297662

Luciobarbus Heckel 1843

2025· article· en· W6930881964 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnoutDonkeyBlack spotLarvaHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to the species of Luciobarbus in the Persian Gulf basin 1a - Numerous large, roundish, dark-brown or black blotches on head, body, and fins arranged in an almost quincunx pattern; 75–88 total lateral-line scales............................................................ L. subquincunciatus (Fig. 4) 1b - Body plain yellow, grey, silvery or black, often upper part of flank brown and lower part yellow or silvery. Irregular shaped, small pale-brown spots present in juveniles; 45–73 (78) total lateral-line scales.................................... 2 2a - Head pike-like, strongly pointed, depressed; mouth sub-terminal or terminal; snout length 2.0–2.9 times in postorbital length in individuals larger than 150 mm SL; 8–11 total gill rakers; 60–73 (–78) total lateral-line scales; juveniles often with many, small dark-brown spots on upper flank.................................................................. L. esocinus 2b - Head barbel-like, not strongly pointed or depressed; mouth inferior in small individuals, inferior or subterminal in large individuals; snout length 1.1–1.9 times postorbital length; 11–24 total gill rakers; 50–62 total lateral-line scales; juveniles without small dark-brown spots on upper flank....................................................... L. schejch

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→