Bibliographic record
Abstract
Miltochrista dharma (Moore, 1879) (Figs 13–21, 103, 104, 137) Setina dharma Moore, 1879, Proceedings of the general meetings for scientific business of the Zoological Society of London, 1879: 394 (Type locality: [N India, Himachal Pradesh, Kangra Valley, Dharamshala] “ Dharmsala, N.W. Himalaya”). = Asura lacteoflava lacteoflava Rothschild, 1913, Novitates Zoologicae, 20 (1): 208 (Type locality: [N India, Himachal Pradesh, Chamba District] “ Dalhousie, N.W. India ”). Type material examined. Lectotype of Setina dharma (designated herein) (Fig. 13): ♂, “ Kangra | Hocking | 83–26.” / “ Setina | Dharma, M[oore] | (type)” / red ring “Type” label / QR-code label with unique ID “ NHMUK010598179 ” (NHMUK). Lectotype of Asura lacteoflava lacteoflava (designated herein) (Fig. 14): ♂, “ Dalhousie | June, 1891” / “Rothschild | Bequest | B.M.1939-1.” / red label “ Asura | lacteoflava | Type Rothsch.” / QR-code label with unique ID “ NHMUK010598181 ” (NHMUK). Additional material examined: series of both sexes from northeastern Pakistan, Nepal and India (Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, West Bengal, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram) (MWM / ZSM, NZCZSI, NHMUK, ZFMK). Notes. (1) Moore (1879) described Setina dharma without the number and sex of specimens being specified. In order to stabilise the nomenclature, the male syntype labelled as “Type” and preserved in NHMUK is hereby designated as the lectotype. (2) Rothschild (1913) described Asura lacteoflava lacteoflava from the unspecified number of specimens of both sexes. In order to stabilise the nomenclature, the male syntype labelled as “Type” and preserved in NHMUK is hereby designated as the lectotype. (3) The species has two forms: with and without a medial transverse line. The latter one is more common in the western part of its range while the proportion of specimens with a medial line is higher in the east. These forms display no differences in their genitalia structures, and as they do not belong to separated populations the presence or absence of a medial line has no taxonomic importance in M. dharma. Diagnosis. The forewing length is 10.0–12.0 mm in males and 11.0– 12.5 mm in females. The species is reminiscent of M. butleri Leech, [1889], stat. rev. and the detailed comparison is provided below in the diagnosis of the latter species. Distribution. Northeastern Pakistan, Nepal (new records), North and Northeast India (Moore 1879; Hampson 1900; Rothschild 1913; Kirti & Singh 2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".