Melicope baueri Appelhans & W. L. Wagner 2025, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2.Melicope baueri(Schott) Appelhans & W. L. Wagner comb. nov. Vepris simplicifolia Endl., Prod. Fl. Norfolk: 89. 1833. Acronychia baueri Schott Fragm. Bot. 5. t. 3. 1834. Type: locality unknown, possibly Norfolk Island, Bauer s. n. (not located). Acronychia simplicifolia (Endl.) Steud., Nomencl. Bot. [Steudel] 2, ed. 2: 747. 1841. Acronychia hillii F. Muell., Fragm. (Mueller) 1: 26. 1858. Type: Australia, Queensland, Brisbane River, s. d., Hill s. n. (lectotype, designated here, MEL [MEL 48088!]); Australia, Queensland, Brisbane River, Moreton Bay, Jul. 1855, von Mueller s. n. (syntypes BM [BM 000798425!], K [K 000717524!], MEL [MEL 48077!]). Jambolifera baueri (Schott) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 102. 1891. Type: Based on Acronychia baueri Schott Acronychia baueri Schott forma majoriflora Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 89: 294. 1927. Type: Australia, Queensland, Brisbane River, 1863–1865. Dietrich s. n. (holotype PR [PR 0528155!]; isotypes BRI [BRI-AQ 0150877!], HBG!). Bauerella baueri (Schott) Engl. ex Däniker, Vierteljahrsschr. Naturf. Ges. Zürich 77 (Beibl. 19): 202. 1932. Type: Based on Acronychia baueri Schott Acronychia simplicifolia (Endl.) McGill. & P. S. Green, J. Arnold Arb. 51: 209. 1970, isonym. Acronychia simplicifolia (Endl.) Steudel ssp. simplicifolia, J. Arnold Arb. 51: 209, fig. 1 a. 1970, as Acronychia simplicifolia (Endl.) McGill. & P. S. Green ssp. simplicifolia. Bauerella simplicifolia (Endl.) T. G. Hartley, J. Arnold Arb. 56: 168. 1975. Bauerella simplicifolia (Endl.) T. G. Hartley ssp. simplicifolia, J. Arnold Arb. 56: 168, fig. 1 b & 1 c. 1975. Sarcomelicope simplicifolia (Endl.) T. G. Hartley, Austral. J. Bot. 30: 369. 1982. Sarcomelicope simplicifolia (Endl.) T. G. Hartley ssp. simplicifolia, Austral. J. Bot. 30: 370. 1982. Type material. Australia: Norfolk Island, s. d., Bauer s. n. (holotype W [W 0046195!]; isotype W [W 0046196!]). Note. The specific epithet simplicifolia is pre-empted in Melicope. Melicope simplicifolia Domin is a synonym of Melicope broadbentiana F. M. Bailey. The second oldest epithet “ baueri ” is used for this species accordingly. 2.1. Melicope baueri subsp. baueri
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".