Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alloperla vostoki Ricker, 1947 Notes This species is commonly referred to as the Scotia Sallfly (Stark et al. 2012). Similar to A. voinae, this rare species is also considered vulnerable to extirpation or extinction (NatureServe 2024). Alloperla vostoki has been reported infrequently in Canada from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and in the USA from Maine, New York, and Pennsylvania (Surdick 2004, DeWalt et al. 2024). This species was collected most efficiently with beating sheets and UV light trapping methods. Adults of this species have been collected in New York from early June through early July (Fig. 26) at elevations ranging from 88-466 m asl (Fig. 27) from sporadic locations in Level IV Ecoregions Catskill High Peaks (58 y), Tug Hill Transition (58 af), Hudson Valley (59 i), Glaciated Low Allegheny Plateau (60 a), Finger Lakes Uplands and Gorges (60 d), Ontario Lowlands (83 c), and Mohawk Valley (83 f) (Fig. 29 a). This species was encountered in small to medium sized streams and rivers with underlying shale formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".