Hypotrix parallela Lafontaine & Ferris & Walsh 2010, comb. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypotrix parallela (Grote, 1883), comb. n. Figs 4, 21, 36 Trichorthosia parallela Grote, 1883: 31. Taeniocampa terminatissima Dyar, 1904: 104. Type material. Trichorthosia parallela: holotype. New Mexico [location unknown]. Taeniocampa terminatissima: holotype ♀ [USNM, examined]. Type locality: New Mexico, Las Vegas. Other material examined and distribution. Mexico: State of Durango (Sierra Madre Occidental). USA: Arizona: Apache Co. (White Mts) and Cochise Co. (Huachuca Mts). Colorado: La Plata Co. (San Juan Mts); New Mexico: Colfax (Sangre de Cristo Mts), Grant Co. (Pinos Altos Mts), Lincoln (Capitan Mts), McKinley Co. (Zuni Mts), and Rio Arriba Co. Texas: Jeff Davis Co. (Davis Mts). Diagnosis. Hypotrix parallela is a medium-sized species (forewing length: 13–15 mm) with a pale silky brownish-gray forewing and fuscous hindwing. Most of the forewing markings are obscure except for a straight white subterminal line bordered proximally by dark-gray, a dark spot in the lower part of the pale-orange reniform spot, and a small black dot in a pale area representing the orbicular spot. Th e medial line is somewhat diffuse but still distinctive because it extends in an oblique line from the costa to the dark patch in the reniform spot, then bends abruptly about 90° to continue in a straight but oblique line to the posterior margin of the forewing. Th ere are spiniform setae near the ends of the middle and hind tibiae. The male genitalia are similar to those of Hypotrix ferricola and H. diplogramma, but the uncus is less spatulate apically, the cucullus much broader with a narrow gap between it and the sacculus, and the vesica has a bulbous cornutus on a short diverticulum about 1/3 from its base. The genitalia are most similar to those of Hypotrix rubra, described below. In the female genitalia the corpus bursae is much larger, and the appendix bursae is shorter and wider than in H. ferricola and H. diplogramma. Distribution and biology. Hypotrix parallela occurs from southwestern Colorado southward through eastern Arizona, New Mexico, and western Texas to the State of Durango in northern Mexico. Collecting dates range from early July to late August in ponderosa pine parkland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".