Euura perkioemaekii Prous & Liston & Monckton & Kramp & Vårdal & Vikberg & Heibo & Mutanen 2025
Bibliographic record
Abstract
125 Euura perkioemaekii (Lindqvist, 1960) comb. nov. Figs 102, 345 Pachynematus perkioemaekii Lindqvist, 1960b: 36–37. Diagnosis Female 5.3–5.5 mm (n = 2). Mostly black body, not bifid claws (with small or large subapical tooth), and lancets should enable separation of females of this species from most of the other Euura. Euura punctifrons, with a small subapical tooth, have a somewhat similar lancet, but this species tends to be smaller (<5 mm) and even darker (pronotum black and femora usually mostly black) than E. perkioemaekii (pronotum posteriorly and femora mostly pale). Very similar can also be dark specimens of E. bipartita, which seem to have somewhat differently shaped serrulae (ventrobasal tip more acute and often more protruding) and at least usually seem to have bifid claws. Male The males, which have penis valves most similar to E. bipartita and E. monticola, might not be distinguishable from dark specimens of E. bipartita that have a small subapical tooth on the claw. Type material examined Holotype Pachynematus perkioemaekii FINLAND – Kuusamo • ♀; Oulanka; 66.47° N, 29.08° E; 1 Jul. 1958; J. Perkiömäki leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GL.3509. Notes 16 serrulae. Nearly perfect morphological match: DEI-GISHym84260 (15–16 serrulae). Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.91%, is Euura monticola. Nuclear Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.06% (0.12% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.21%, is Euura bipartita. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".