MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930968277 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2583760

Multimodale Interaktion mit HMIs in der Smart Factory

2017· article· de· W6930968277 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Innovation in Industries
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsFactory (object-oriented programming)Data collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digitale Assistenzsysteme finden zunehmend Verbreitung am industriellen Shop-Floor. Dieser Beitrag präsentiert eine Evaluierung multimodaler Interaktionstechniken mit Datenbrillen hinsichtlich deren Auswirkung auf die Akzeptanz und Zufriedenheit der Mitarbeiter. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass menschliche Faktoren (z. B. Persönlichkeit, Erfahrung mit Datenbrillen, Erwartungen bezüglich potenzieller Vorteile der Nutzung digitaler Assistenzsysteme) keine wesentlichen Auswirkungen auf die Zufriedenheit haben. Vielmehr sind das Ausmaß der wahrgenommenen Vorteile auf die tatsächliche Nutzung der Technologie und die Benutzerfreundlichkeit die primären Faktoren, die Auswirkungen auf die Zufriedenheit der Mitarbeiter erzielen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it