Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytobia corona Boucher, n. sp. (Figs 12; 13) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9E680B5E-336B-4E09-90EA-101D54BAB2A7 TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Guyane • ♂; Mitaraka, sampling site: MIT-E-savane roche 2; 02°13’59.8”N, 54°27’46.5”W; 471 m; open/ partially opened areas; 13-20.VIII.2015; MT (6 m); Pierre-Henri Dalens leg.; sample code: MITARAKA/230, sorted by M. Pollet; MNHN. ETYMOLOGY. — The specific name is derived from the Latin “corona ” (crown), referring to the spinose ring-like sclerite on the distiphallus. DIAGNOSIS. — This species can be distinguished by its bicolorous frons (black posteriorly and orange anteriorly), and the male genitalia, especially the long distiphallus with a spinose sclerite located a little before midpoint. DISTRIBUTION. — French Guiana. HOST. — Unknown. DESCRIPTION Male Orbital plate not projecting in front of eye in profile; orbital plate 0.14 × width of frons at midpoint; frons width including orbital plates 0.32 mm at midpoint; lunule small; ocellar triangle extended anteriorly to level of anterior ors; two reclinate ors and two ori: upper ori reclinate and lower ori inclinate; orbital setulae reclinate, in one row; first flagellomere small, rounded apically with short pubescence; arista with long pubescence; gena extremely narrow, at midpoint about 0.03 × maximum eye height (Fig. 12B); clypeus narrow, with upper margin rounded; epistoma absent (Fig. 12D); 3 + 0 dc, with only two posterior ones well-developed, and anterior postsutural dc about 0.30 × length of second dc; prsc present; acrostichal setulae numerous, in about 8-9 rows; mid tibia with two posterolateral setae; wing length 2.3 mm; last section of M 4 approximately 0.7 × length of penultimate section; vein R 4+5 ending close to wing tip; distal margin of R 1 expanded near junction (Fig. 12A). Colour Similar to P. dalensi Boucher, n. sp. described below, with following differences: frons mat, bicolorous: black posteriorly at level of ocellar triangle and orange anteriorly (Fig. 12C); orbital plate brownish black to level of upper ori, yellowish below; clypeus black; face yellowish brown; antennae yellow, first flagellomere infuscated with brown (Fig. 12B, D); palpus yellow; mesonotum shiny brown except for posterolateral corner with distinct yellow patch (Fig. 12E, visible on one side due to the collapse of the mesonotum); calypter and calypteral margin yellow; fringe brown; abdomen yellow with dark brown spots medially on tergites 3-6 in addition to lateral brown spots on tergites 5-6 (Fig. 12F). Male genitalia Distiphallus separated into two long tubules, which are longer than the hypandrium and phallapodeme (Fig. 13A, B) (distiphallus possibly longer than illustrated considering that the distal end appears truncated in the holotype); tubules straight, without distinct curvature; phallus with a ring-like sclerite armed with teeth (Fig. 13 A-C); ring-like sclerite located slightly below midpoint (Fig. 13A); distal end of phallus (distal to ring-like sclerite) measuring 0.4 mm (possibly longer, see comment above); distal end of phallus (distal to sclerite) about 3 × longer than basal part (arrows, Fig. 13A); mesophallus short, oval, somewhat bean-shaped (Fig. 13A); hypandrium narrow, constricted near midpoint, with distal end bent (Fig. 13B, arrow); ejaculatory apodeme with very short stalk and medium-sized blade (Fig. 13E); surstylus, typical of the Phytobia unica group (see above) with multiple spines (Fig. 13D). REMARKS This species belongs to the Phytobia unica -group (Boucher 2010) and is morphologically most similar to P.guatemalensis Sasakawa, 2005 due to its bicolorous frons and the characteristic spinose sclerite on the distiphallus. It differs from P. guatemalensis by the small yellow patch on the posterolateral corner of the mesonotum (Fig. 12E) (mesonotum described as entirely black in P. guatemalensis), the presence of two posterolateral setae on the mid tibia (only one in P. guatemalensis according to original description) and the longer distiphallus with the spinose sclerite located slightly before the midpoint of the distiphallus. The phallus of P. guatemalensis is shorter and the spinose sclerite is located near the end of distiphallus. This species was listed as morphospecies Phytobia Mit- 5 in Boucher & Pollet (2021).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".