MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931007730 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2560836

tqdm/tqdm: tqdm v4.31.0 stable

2019· other· en· W6931007730 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsByteDocumentationBar (unit)Code (set theory)Test (biology)Set (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Write bytes to stdout/stderr in py2 (https://bugs.python.org/issue21363, #589 -> #598) Add write_bytes parameter for py2/3 default override support custom bar characters vias ascii parameter (#223 -> #227) implement, document and test custom bar spinners support custom bar_format with unknown total (#282 -> #284) fix TypeError when unit_scale and unknown total document format_dict expose elapsed_s, remaining_s to bar_format add unit option to bar_format (#368) auto README.rst generation framework add notes in CONTRIBUTING.md update tests update documentation misc code tidy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0070.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3430.382

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSex and Gender in Healthcare→French-language works237,207→