FIG. 6. — A-E in Recent Brachiopoda from the Mozambique-Madagascar area, western Indian Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIG. 6. — A-E, Xenobrochus africanus (Cooper, 1973), Mozambique Channel, Inhambane transect, MAINBAZA, stn CP 3143, 264-277 m (MNHN IB-2013-50): A, B, dorsal view of complete specimen and enlargement of the umbonal part to show details of the beak (B); C, inner view of ventral valve; D, E, inner view of dorsal valve (C), and enlargement of posterior part (E) to show details of brachial skeleton; F-J, Gryphus capensis Jackson, 1952, North-West Madagascar, West of Cap d'Ambre, MIRIKY, stn DW 3196, 238-249 m (MNHN IB-2013-43): F-H, inner view of ventral valve (F), enlargement of posterior part (G) to show teeth and symphytium, and broken transverse section, showing secondary fibres and prims of the tertiary layer (top), characteristic for the genus, I, J, inner view of dorsal valve, and enlargement of posterior part (J) to show details of cardinalia and loop. All SEMs. Scale bars: A, C, D, F, I, 2 mm; B, E, G, J, 1 mm; H, 50 µm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".