Culicoides (Monoculicoides) occidentalis Wirth and Jones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Culicoides (Monoculicoides) occidentalis Wirth and Jones Culicoides variipennis occidentalis Wirth and Jones, 1957: 21 (California, USA). Culicoides occidentalis occidentalis: Downes 1978: 63 (change in status). Culicoides occidentalis: Holbrook et al. 2000: 71 (genetic analysis of variipennis complex; distribution). Culicoides (Monoculicoides) occidentalis: Borkent and Spinelli 2000: 36 (in catalog of the Americas south of the USA; distribution); Borkent and Grogan 2009: 15 (in Nearctic catalog; distribution). Discussion. This western Nearctic species occurs in southern British Columbia, Canada south to California, Nevada, New Mexico and Texas in the USA, and Mexico in Baja California and Puebla (Holbrook et al. 2000; Borkent and Grogan 2009). We provide an additional record from Baja California. New records. Baja California Sur, Loreto, 10 mi. S. Canipole, 28 August 1959, Radford & Werner, light trap, 3 females, 2 males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".