Bibliographic record
Abstract
Camptopteroides Viggiani, 1974 Camptopteroides Viggiani, 1974: 3. Type species: Camptopteroides armata Viggiani, by original designation. Paranagroidea Noyes & Valentine, 1989: 44. Type species: Paranagroidea verrucosa Noyes & Valentine, by original designation. Synonymy by Huber & Lin, 1999: 31. Diagnosis. Camptopteroides belongs to the Camptoptera group of genera which includes Camptoptera Foerster, Camptopteroides Viggiani, Callodicopus Ogloblin, Eofoersteria Mathot, Ptilomymar Annecke & Doutt, Macro- camptoptera Girault and Stephanocampta Mathot. The Camptoptera group is recognized by following features: head usually with sharply margined occiput dorsally; petiole distinct and narrow but short; mesophragma not pro- jecting into gaster (except Callodicopus); fore wing narrow, usually curved apically (except in Camptopteroides); mandible with 1 or 2 teeth; female funicle usually 6- or 7-segmented (when 7-segmented, fl 2 minute, ring-like) or rarely 8-segmented [in Ptilomymar Annecke & Doutt] (Lin et al. 2007). Camptopteroides is distinguished from other genera in the group following the key given by Huber & Lin (1999) by the unique combination of features: mandible with 2 teeth; parastigma with both macrochaetae, especially the distal one, long and distinct; propodeum with distinct, raised reticulate sculpture and without translucent lamina; fore wing with alternating brown and hya- line bands or with yellow suffusion, not completely hyaline. Hosts. Unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".