MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931083069 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3796944

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) filicauda Henriksen & Lundbeck

2019· article· en· W6931083069 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPain Management and Placebo Effect
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynonym (taxonomy)CourtesyPopulationTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) filicauda Henriksen & Lundbeck (Figs 22–24) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 905175E1-7EDD-4749-B76D-D20CF9549459 Rhamphomyia filicauda Henriksen & Lundbeck, 1917: 608. Type-locality: Greenland. Other references: Melander, 1928: 192 (catalogue); Henriksen, 1939: 80 (Greenland list); Oliver, 1963: 178 (species list); Melander, 1965: 463 (catalogue); Downes, 1970: 778 (phenology); Danks, 1981: 465 (arctic insects); Brodo, 2000: 151 (survey). Rhamphomyia (Pararhamphomyia) filicauda Henriksen & Lundbeck: Frey, 1955a: 478 (revision); Yang et al., 2007: 194 (catalogue); Barták, 2015: 576 (Greenland fauna). Rhamphomyia similata Malloch, 1919: 46. Type-locality: Bernard Harbour, Nunavut, Canada. Other references: Melander, 1928: 205 (catalogue); McDunnough, 1928: 119 (insects of Baffin Island); Melander, 1965: 465 (catalogue); Downes, 1970: 778 (as new synonym of filicauda); Cooper & Cumming, 1993: 32 (type catalogue). Notes on synonymy. The authorship of this species is listed as Henriksen & Lundbeck in catalogues, but in the “Supplement list of Insects of Greenland ” by Henriksen (1939: 80) and Frey (1955a: 478) Lundbeck is listed as the sole author. There is no indication in Henriksen & Lundbeck (1917) that only Lundbeck is responsible for the new species of Diptera. He most likely was, but as this is neither given, nor even indicated (except that the illustration is Lundbeck’s and the descriptive style is his), then authorship should go to both. Henriksen (1939) probably gave Lundbeck the sole authorship from pure courtesy (Pape 2017, pers. comm.). The synonym of Rhamphomyia similata with R. filicauda was long recognized in the Empididae collection of the CNC and Downes (1970) clearly proposed this synonym, which we can also confirm. This synonym was apparently unknown to Melander (1965). Type material examined. Rhamphomyia filicauda: LECTOTYPE ♂ (here designated in order to fix iden- tity of the species) ♂ (Fig. 22A), labelled (Fig. 22B): “[Greenland] Hold ♂ / w. [with] Hope [73°45′N 21°0′W]/ 20–7.[18]91/ Deichmann”; “Type [coloured label]”; “zmuc/ 00025660”; “ LECTOTYPE / Rhamphomyia / filicauda / Henriksen & Lundbeck/ des. Sinclair 2017 [red label]” (ZMUC). PARALECTOTYPES: same data as lectotype, 20–21.vii.1891, zmuc 00025661–664 (1 ♂, 3 ♀, ZMUC); Hekla Havn [Greenland], viii.1891, Deichmann; Cotype, No. 26962; Greenland, Acc. No. 71429 (1 ♂, USNM); same data, zmuc 0025665 (1 ♀, ZMUC); Sabine Ø [74°36′N 18°59′W], vii.1900, Deichmann, zmuc 0025666–671 (3 ♂, 3 ♀, ZMUC); Rypefjaeld [76°56′N], viii.1908, Dan- marksexp, zmuc 00256720673 (1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZMUC). Rhamphomyia similata: HOLOTYPE ♂ (Fig. 22C), labelled (Fig. 22D): “ Holotype / Rhamphomyia / similata Mall. / CNC No. 217 [red label]”; “Bernard/ Harbor/ N.W. T./ July/ 18 -19”; “Canadian/ Arctic/ Expedition/ F.J. [F. Johansen] 1915”; “ Rhamphomyia / similata/ Mall. Type [handwritten by Malloch?]” (CNC). PARATYPE: same data as holotype (1 ♀, CNC). Additional material examined. CANADA. Northwest Territories: Banks Is., Aulavik NP, 73.22181° to 73.23193°, -119.56059° to -119.58330°, 7–19.vii.2011, wet & mesic, pan traps, Repl.1–3, NBP field party (16 ♂, LEM); Banks Is., Aulavik NP, 73.22855°, -119.58662°, 7–11.vii.2011, mesic, pan traps, Repl.3, NBP field party (1 ♂, barcoded, LEM); Banks Is., Masik R., 3–6.vii.1968, W. R.M. Mason (21 ♂, 7 ♀, CNC); same data, 14– 20.vii.1968, G.E. Shewell (5 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC): Sachs Harbour (Banks Is.), 27–30.vi.1968, W. R. Mason (6 ♂, 9 ♀, CNC); Victoria Is., 71°17′N, 114°W, 1–30.vii.1975, G. & M. Wood (29 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC). Nunavut: Axel Heiberg Is., 79°25′N, 90°45′W, 19–23.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (9 ♂, 18 ♀, CNC); same data, Gypsum Hill, 20–21.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (8 ♂, 16 ♀, CNC); same data, Colour Lk., 22.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (2 ♂, CNC); same data, Wolf R., 24.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (2 ♂, 5 ♀, CNC); same data, Wh. Glacier, 26.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (1 ♂, CNC); same data, creek 4 km NE, 4.viii.1963, H.K. Rutz (1 ♀, CNC); Cambridge Bay, 18–26.vii.1950, G.K. Sweatman (13 ♂, 22 ♀, CNC); Cambridge Bay, 20.vii.1950, E.H.N. Smith (7 ♂, 13 ♀, CNC); Coral Harbour, Southampton Is., 6–8.vii.1948, G.E. Shewell (12 ♂, 30 ♀, CNC); Ellesmere Is., 79°29′N, 75°50′W, 18–24.vii., 1–15.viii.1980, J.S.E.P.M.B. (22 ♂, 21 ♀, CNC); Eureka, Ellesmere Is., 28.vii.1953, 3–26.vii.1954, P.F. Bruggemann (10 ♂, 18 ♀, CNC); Hazen Camp, 81°49′N, 71°18′W, 14–25.vi., 4–20.vii.1962, R.B. Madge (8 ♂, 12 ♀, CNC; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, UGIC); Hazen Camp, NE.372, 81°49′N, 71°16′W, 8–12.vii.1962, D. R. Oliver (2 ♀, CNC); Hazen Camp, Ellesmere Is., 9–22.vii.1961, D. R. Oliver (10 ♂, 5 ♀, CNC); same data, 19–24.vi.1962, J.F. McAlpine (25 ♂, 26 ♀, CNC); Hazen Lake, Elles- mere Is., 2–26.vii.1963, B. Hocking (11 ♂, 14 ♀, CNC); Hazen Lake, Ellesmere Is., 9–17.vii.1963, M.10, A.9, C.D. Sharplin (7 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC); Hazen Camp, 89°49′N, 71°18′W, 11–16.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (14 ♂, 20 ♀, CNC); same data, 1.viii.1963, J. R. Vockeroth (2 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); same data, 17.vii.1963, R.E. Leech (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Hazen Camp, 81°49′N, 71°16′W, 12.vii.1962, J.A. Downes (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); same data, 1.vii.1962, P.S. Corbet (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Hot Weather Creek, Forsheim Peninsula, Ellesmere Is., 79°58′N, 84°28′W, on Dryas flowers, wet meadows, fen, 18–28.vi., 1–25.vii.1990, F. Brodo (12 ♂, 7 ♀, CNC); Lady Melville Lk., 93°15′W, 69°25′N, 3.vii.1951, J.G. Chillcott (2 ♂, 3 ♀, CNC); Nettilling Lk., Baffin Is., 9.vii.1925, J.D. Soper (1 ♂, CNC); Spence Bay, 2–22.vii.1951, J.G. Chillcott, A.E. R. Downe (12 ♂, 14 ♀, CNC); Tanquary Fjord, Ellesmere Is., 18.vii.1963, H.K. Rutz (4 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC). Yukon: 68°01′N, 136°42′W, hilltop, Surfbird knob, 30.vi.1987, S.A. Marshall (1 ♂, 1 ♀, UGIC); Brit- ish Mts., 69°13′N, 140°05′W, 21–25.vi.1984, G. & M. Wood & D. Lafontaine, CNC 163271, CNC 163272 (2 ♂, barcoded, CNC); Dempster Hwy, km 155, 18–20.vi. 1980, 950 m, Wood & Lafontaine (4 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Herschel Is, 28–29.vi.1971, D.M. Wood (1 ♀, CNC). GREENLAND. Nedre Midsommer Sö [not shown on Fig. 26], 24.vi., 1–30.vii., 5.viii.1966, Can. Peary Land Expd. (109 ♂, 116 ♀, CNC); Greenland (1 ♂, 4 ♀, USNM); Hoels Expd., viii.1930, Østgrønland (2 ♂, MZH). Diagnosis. This dark legged-and dark setose species is distinguished from other species of Pararhamphomyia by its very long thoracic setae with 6–7 scutellar setae and many long proepisternal setae, entirely pruinose scutum, male hind femur with several rows of setae anteroventrally, especially more stout apically, male hind tibia evenly tapered, straight, long filamentous phallus and male cercus strongly constricted in middle and V-shaped. Redescription. Wing length 4.8–5.4 mm. Male. Head dark in ground-colour, with dense greyish pruinescence on face, frons, postgena and occiput. Holoptic, eye with ommatidia larger on upper half, smaller on lower half. Frons represented by very small triangular space below ocellar tubercle and larger subtriangular space above antennae, bare; face very short, bare, with oral margin dark and shiny. Ocellar triangle dark, subshiny, with 2 pairs of subequally long setae; 3 pairs of postocellar setae dark, finer, shorter than ocellar setae. Occiput bearing dense row of postocular setae, black, long, only present on upper occipital section; occipital setae slightly shorter than postocular setae; postgena bearing many setae, more slender than occipital and postocular setae. Antenna dark brown; scape slightly longer than pedicel; pedicel bulbous; postpedicel 3X longer than basal width; subequal to length of scape. Palpus brownish-black, with setulae long and dark. Clypeus large, with margin shiny and somewhat medially, otherwise pruinescent; labrum lustrous and dark reddish-brown with pale apex, longer than head height; labellum with ventral side black and bearing dark setulae. Thorax dark in ground-colour, largely densely pruinescent; 2 indistinct dark vittae between acr and dc rows. Proepisternum with more than 10 long, dark setae on lower section; upper proepisternum in front of spiracle bare; prosternum bare. Antepronotum with dense, stout dark setae, shorter in middle, longer laterally. Postpronotal lobe with dense cluster of more than 15 uniformly long setae. Scutum with dense biserial row of long, dark acr increasing in length posteriorly; dc slightly longer than acr, increasing in length posteriorly; more than 10 presut spal; notopleuron bearing cluster of long, dark setae anteriorly and 5–6 stronger setae posteriorly; cluster of slender prealar setae; 5–6 psut spal; 2–3 pal; scutellum with 6–7 pairs of dark, stout, long setae. Laterotergite bearing dense cluster of dark setae. Anterior and posterior spiracles brown with darker ring. Legs reddish brown, subshiny; coxae similar to thorax. Hind and mid coxae with numerous dark, stout, lateral setae; fore coxa with many long, stout setae anteriorly. Fore femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of setae, finer than those of mid and hind femora. Mid femur with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of stout setae; some long ventral setae near base. Hind femur (Fig. 23B) with 1 anteroventral and 1 posteroventral row of setae; anteroventral setae longer and stronger than posteroventrals, especially apically. Fore tibia with mat of fine golden ventral and posterior setulae; numerous long, thin, pale setae posteriorly; 5–7 stout anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae; circlet of strong subapical setae. Mid tibia with 5–7 stout anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae; numerous fine posterior setae; anteroventral and posteroventral rows of stout setae, shorter than tibial width; several spine-like preapical ventral setae. Hind tibia (Fig. 23B) uniform in thickness, with anteroventral row of dark, stout setae on apical 2/3; row of stout anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae; 1 seta in posteroapical comb, longer than apical width of tibia. All tarsomere 1 slender with preapical circlet of dark, stout setae less than twice tarsal width; stout anteroventral, posteroventral and dorsal setae; tarsomeres with dist

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPain Management and Placebo EffectFrench-language works237,207